« CassTel fraud: Rest of the story | Main | Overland Park daily offenses »

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Cat-stomper gets probation

Abuser_3648Ph2005100702039This case - a cat stomped to death in a garbage can -  drew letters and animal-rightists, but little other attention. Hmm, what if Luke (on the sill) had been a dog?

WASHINGTON —A Northern Virginia man convicted of stomping a cat to death told a judge Tuesday that he regretted what happened, but insisted his actions were a desperate attempt to stop the declawed, 14-year-old cat from biting his leg.
The argument did not sway Loudoun County Circuit Court Judge J. Howe Brown. In sentencing Peter Landrith, 39 (above), to three years in prison, all suspended, and five years’ probation, Brown was emphatic that Landrith maliciously killed the cat
Story: DOC PDF

Boyfriend guilty of cruelty in cat's death (WashPost 10/8)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b1b869e200d834a50fdf69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cat-stomper gets probation:

Comments

Suspended prison sentence? Five years probation? Boy, that'll discourage him, won't it?

Where's the "punishment" part of this felony conviction? What a joke.

This is disgusting and I hope this guy meets a fate as cruel as that which he inflicted on the cat he so maliciously killed.

I agree with a lot of what Brad said in his post. I believe that criminologists have also shown a direct link with people that abuse animals and serial killers, so this guy may be the next Bundy. They should have given him some kind of time, and maybe some community service in the way of cleaning the kennels or cages (under watchful eyes of course) at an animal shelter or zoo. Most judges have about zero creativity when it comes to sentencing!

That is no way to treat pussy!!!!!!!!!!

"Most judges have about zero creativity when it comes to sentencing!"

I don't know about this particular court, tomcat, but most states limit judicial discretion when it comes to sentencing. And judges who get creative in sentencing are often tripped up by the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

If the cat hadn't been declawed, it probably wouldn't be a biter. How did they expect it to defend itself after they ripped its paws up like that? Morons!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

 
About KansasCity.com | About the Real Cities Network | Terms of Use & Privacy Statement | About the McClatchy Company | Copyright