Just my $0.02, but Star sports columnist Jason Whitlock had an outstanding column this morning on Bill Cosby's Call-Out here Tuesday, which drew about 2,000 persons to Penn Valley Community College:
- I wasn’t shocked at all by what I heard from Cosby on Wednesday. I’d heard it all before at the Million Man March. Cosby was plainspoken, direct and brutally honest.
- Cosby stated that too many black people have accepted the labels — “at-risk, disadvantaged and minority” — put on them by the mainstream media.
- “Harriet Tubman had to put a gun to some (slaves’) heads to get them off the plantation,” Cosby said, referring to the queen of the Underground Railroad. “You know why? Because some of us want to stay at-risk and disadvantaged.”
This blog is about crime, not race, but it's hard to ignore the intersection of the two in this country. Related topics have come up on this blog before and can be found in the One Kansas City? category.
As Jason says, Cosby's line has drawn much fire. Latest attack:
Standing up to Cosby's harsh attacks on poor blacks
Like the start of baseball season and the end of the school year, Bill Cosby's rants against the black poor are becoming a perennial feature of the impending summer. On the most recent stops along his 18-city "Call Out" tour, Mr. Cosby has reignited controversy by publicly attacking young black men.
While I don't question his love for black people, his recent actions have appeared more venomous than valuable, more condescending than caring and more hateful than helpful.
- Marc Lamont Hill, an assistant professor of urban education at Temple University, writing in the Baltimore Sun today.
PLEASE NOTE:
Some well-received new rules for commenting.
1. Comments must be signed. Unsigned comments will be deleted.
2. Comments signed as someone other than the writer will be deleted.
3. No profanity or vulgarity, racially or sexually offensive speech.
4. THINK before you comment and please stay on topic.
Thanks,
Greg Reeves



I think that i understand that, but before i commented i wanted to be sure.
Posted by: christina | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 02:31 PM
Besides i know that i will be great someday. Why, I am working my butt off to acheive my goals, so dont hate me(monty) Because my goals are bigger than yours.
Posted by: christina | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 02:38 PM
I missed a couple of comments that were a bit contradictory also. j-sizzle said "shouldn't Cosby be drawing up a plan to sell pudding pops or fat albert memorbilla for the innercity or something instead of blasting poor blacks behind their backs at college graduations?"
I think that to say something like this misses the whole point of taking responsibility for your own actions. Cosby came up with a plan. His plan is not blame others for your problems and do something about it, don't wait on someone to hold your hand because it isn't going to happen.
Posted by: Brian H. | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 02:41 PM
I have copied an article by leonard pitts of the miami herald, who talk about "white men" like bill cosby and Jason whitlock it follows:
IN MY OPINION
Whites should acknowledge failings, tooBY LEONARD PITTS JR.
lpitts@MiamiHerald.com
Thank you, but I don't need a lecture on personal responsibility.
Many of you apparently felt otherwise after reading my recent column on the use of the justice system as a cudgel against black children.
The column dealt with the mistreatment of over 100 juveniles, most of them African American, who were left in a flooded New Orleans detention center for up to five days without food and water after Hurricane Katrina. It was also about the death of Martin Lee Anderson, an unresisting 14-year-old black kid who was hit, choked and restrained by up to nine guards in a Panama City ``boot camp.''
The abuse and the disproportionate number of black kids who wind up in those places was, I said, a legacy of the nation's historic tendency to use its justice system to control a population it finds frightening and inconvenient.
ISSUE OF RESPONSIBILITY
In response, a woman named Charlene demanded to know, ''When is the black community going to take responsibility for themselves?'' An individual named Don wrote, ''Why are they in jail? Because most young blacks are thugs, dope dealers and car thieves in my experience.'' A fellow named Jay wrote that, ''AA women need to stop having children out of wedlock. . . . Raise a child in a home with a mother and father and you will see the stats for crime go way down.'' Some people, using statistics freshly pulled from their backsides, sought to ''prove'' black kids commit pretty much all of the crime in the country.
And one individual said Martin Lee Anderson's guards ``did us all a favor.''
As I said, some people find the existence of black children inconvenient.
You want to talk responsibility? I'm fine with that. Much of what ails African America lies squarely within its power to fix; I've been saying that in this space for many years.
But the fact is, the need for greater personal responsibility, important as it is, does not of itself account for all the dysfunctions that beset the African-American community.
LOOKING PAST RACISM
Of course, many white folks don't want to go there. And it never fails to amaze me how they absolve themselves and this nation of the charge of racism, how readily they look past, look through, flat-out ignore, anything that says otherwise. Indeed, it's telling that of all the dissenters preaching personal responsibility, not a single one refuted or even addressed the statistics in the column suggesting that racial animus plays a role in the disproportionate number of black people behind bars.
I repeat: And Justice For Some, a 2000 study co-sponsored by the Justice Department, found that a black drug defendant is 48 times more likely to be jailed than a white one with the same record.
There's more. According to The Real War on Crime: The Report of the National Criminal Justice Commission, blacks account for 13 percent of all regular drug users but 35 percent of those arrested, 55 percent of those convicted and 74 percent of those imprisoned for drug possession. A 2004 Miami Herald report found that a judicial procedure that allows a defendant's record to be wiped clean of a felony offense is given freely to white drug dealers, rapists and child molesters. But to blacks? Not so much. And this remains true, even when adjusted for socioeconomic factors.
Beg pardon, but ''personal responsibility'' does not explain those disparities. And it's vexing that so many Caucasians find it so hard to get their lips around the word that does.
WAGGING THE FINGER
But then, that would require of them more than the easy ability to wag a finger at the failures of others. It would require a willingness to own their own failures and to face truths that do not flatter self-image -- something some white Americans clearly lack the intestinal fortitude to do. So you'll forgive me if I find it hard to take seriously all this pious advice to African Americans.
Responsibility is a two-way street.
Posted by: MICHAEL OATES | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 02:48 PM
I agree, it is easy for people to go out and preach "personal responsibility" because it absolves them of their own responsibility. The fact is racism still exists whether you like it or not. With the way America is set up currently, even those minorities with "personal responsibility" face an uphill battle. Where is all of this outrage at the Justice system for being unfair? Why don't some white people accept their "personal responsibility" to get out and combat racism? To think that all of the blame for the current situation of blacks lies squarely on their shoulders is just as ignorant as their belief that it all lies squarely on white shoulders. Both sides contribute to the problem and both need to make changes.
Posted by: openmind | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 03:15 PM
Christina,
No attacks but you never mentioned which hospital? (is there one)?
On to more important things. What is a plan to show these youths that there is more to life than living ghettofabulous(quoting cosby). What are your ideas?
Posted by: Jokie McJokemaker | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 03:33 PM
"There's more. According to The Real War on Crime: The Report of the National Criminal Justice Commission, blacks account for 13 percent of all regular drug users but 35 percent of those arrested, 55 percent of those convicted and 74 percent of those imprisoned for drug possession"
Want an explanation for that? Because there are more cops necssary (per capita) in KCMO and KCK, for example, than Lenexa and Overland Park. Drug use may transcend all economic layers, but crime brought on by poverty does not.
Secondly, if you are legitimately guilty, I really don't care at all what race you are.
Posted by: The Angry Conservative | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 04:16 PM
That might explain the higher arrest rate, but it doesn’t explain the higher conviction rate or the higher imprisonment rate.
Posted by: openmind | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 04:22 PM
The only whites keeping blacks down are the liberal parasites blacks continue to vote for. Wake up and realize Uncle Teddy ,Aunt Hillary etc... are the only people with a vested interest in minority failure.
Posted by: monty | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 04:22 PM
I said that was working towards that goal. No not yet there is not a specific hospital.
Posted by: christina | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 04:25 PM
I wonder if whites would prefer an Asian boss or a black boss.
Posted by: Luan | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 04:32 PM
Who cares what color your boss is they are still your boss!
Posted by: christina | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 04:33 PM
I am a black woman with three children, two in college and one still in high school. I was 18 when I gave birth to my first child and I was label just as many black teens are today, the sad thang about that is I and the teens today was and are label more by our own than any other race.
I have told my children that we have been molded to be our own worst enemy, the beatings and the hangings my have stop but they have already acheived their goal. White people no longer have to put us down and tell us we are the weaker race, everytime we lump our children in this hopeless group we continue their legacy for them. I am not who you think I am, I have the ability to change and time has done just that.
I decided long ago that I was going to stop listening to the negativity of my people, who did not like MY choices and judge me accordingly, now I teach my children to do the same. Not everyone will like your choices, yes you will be judge for them and some might lump you into this group and say that's who you are without stopping to get to know you.
Do I believe Mr. Cosby made judgement of the whole by the group that he has seen, yes I do but that is for him to do but I will not let it define me or my choice to raise my children the way I see fit.
Posted by: Maxine | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 04:43 PM
Man, I'm white, and I would take Cosby over any rock star as a roll model almost any day. I don't see why my African- American counterparts don't take him over some rapper who rhymes about knockin up hoes.
Posted by: plattecohighschooler | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 04:48 PM
That's because he is saying what you want to say but can't. Not everyone is going to feel the same about a person or a situation, so do that make them a bad person for it.
Posted by: Maxine | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 04:53 PM
WHEN IT COMES TO DEMOCRAT VS. REPUBLICANS, DEMS ARE FOR THE WORKING MAN ie,,UNIONS AND REPUBS ARE STRICTLY FOR BIG BUSINESS ie..HALLIBURTON. WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON? IT REALLY HAS NO PLACE IN THE DISCUSSION. BUT SINCE IT WAS MENTIONED ON AN EARLIER POST I JUST THREW THIS IN
Posted by: EWAT | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 04:58 PM
EWAT, that's absolutely untrue. Come on. Whitewater? Does that ring a bell? And you must remember that all those Republican- initiated tax breaks for buisnesses that help them hire new workers and turn them into unionized "working men." So all in all, the Republicans are helping the common man by freeing up money for coporations so that they can give the common man work. SO DON'T BE GIVING US THE "BIG BUISINESS FAT CATS AND THEIR REPUBLICAN FRIENDS IN GOVERNMENT" CRAP!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: plattecohighschooler | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 05:21 PM
hey angry white man..er' i mean conserative. you forgot to mention how all the whites who are let off for the same crimes as blacks might have a little to with how your stats are slanted.
Posted by: EWAT | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 05:25 PM
All in all, I think that Cosby is completely justified in his campaign and that Whitlock was justified in writing the article. Cosby is spreading a message of empowerment not unlike the one that feminists (no matter how absurd some of their messages may be) used to free women from subservient treatment. Why shouldn't blacks be empowered as well? Whitlock is someone who has worked to get his position and has made few excuses for what he has done, which is what Cosby advocates and that means that he can write about it. End of story, kiddies.
Posted by: plattecohighschooler | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 05:27 PM
Christina, my comments were rude and uncalled for. I overeacted to your notion that a boy doesnt need aman in the house to be a good man. I agree anything is possible but if the boy knows the father is out there and couldnt care less it can be very difficult and society often feels the wrath of his or her frustrations. First off,I love women,was married and I have adaughter but there is a feminist dogma that stresses men arent necessary and this should not be encouraged regarding kids. Good luck in your quest,I worked in nursing home administration at one time so we are kindreds. Iwill play nicer next time.
Posted by: monty | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 05:28 PM
Yeah. That thing about men not being needed is crap. We aren't all sexist pigs, and we all know that women have absolutely no idea of how much power they have over us. Ask any married man. He could be doing something else. Maybe leading a more adventurous life, but he gave it up for her. The old saying about the wife taking over where the mother leaves off is true. My mom orders my dad around like a drill sargent. Most men think of it as in their best interests to treat women with respect.
Posted by: plattecohighschooler | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 05:36 PM
Here is my take on this issue.Mr Cosby is telling the truth.He went through 3 things that let me know that he has a backbone and someone beside him that is his equal.He was accused of an affair(with a white chick),he was a victim of extortion from I believe the child of the affair,, and he lost his son to an ignorant bastard .This man is rich and can go ahead to Europe or elsewhere like alot of black entertainers.But he's here and he is putting his mouth where where his money is.Wake up everybody!!
Posted by: Ron Davis | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 06:20 PM
I am/was a single mom due to an abusive spouse. I never wanted to be divorced and poor, but I did not want to die or have my children beaten or be around beatings. I was strong as nails, but my son needed a strong, consistent male role model. It did not happen and he suffered. His maturity was delayed until he could in essence father himself. I tried to be both mother and father and just could not give enough. By trying to be both, I failed as a mother as well. We are all passed it, but Cosby is right. I am Caucasian and have 2 degrees. Sometimes being beaten down and having to rise regardless is indeed colorless. Blame never helped me or my son solve anything.
Posted by: Nicki | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 06:35 PM
Nicki, The most powerful comments of the day. P.S. where have you been all my life.
Posted by: monty | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 07:01 PM
here is another news report:
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. -- Black motorists in Missouri continue to be pulled over by police at a higher rate than white and Hispanic drivers, according to an analysis of more than 1.5 million traffic stops made last year.
The annual report released Thursday by Attorney General Jay Nixon shows black drivers were 46 percent more likely to be stopped than either white or Hispanic drivers. The disparity has widened since 2004, when blacks were 38 percent more likely than whites to be stopped.
Although Hispanic motorists were stopped at the same rate as white drivers last year -- an improvement from a slight disparity the previous year -- they were 98 percent more likely to be searched than white drivers.
Black motorists who were stopped were 78 percent more likely to be searched than whites - up from 71 percent in 2004.
Nixon, who is required by law to compile traffic-stop data from Missouri's law enforcement agencies, said the statistical disproportion does not prove law officers are stopping minority drivers because of their race.
But he added: "Missouri law enforcement should continue their constructive efforts to eliminate any perceptions that traffic stops are being made solely on the basis of race, rather than for legitimate reasons."
Nixon said almost the exact same thing in a prepared statement after last year's report.
The regional leader of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People said the report's figures are disturbing. He pointed particularly to the fact that black drivers were stopped and searched at a higher rate than whites, yet contraband was found on black drivers at a lower rate -- in 18.6 percent of searches compared to 23.6 of searches for whites.
Black motorists "are being humiliated by the law. They are being subjected to searches when clearly whatever predisposition the officer had when they stopped them is not being validated by the hard evidence of the stop," said the Rev. Gill Ford, of St. Louis, director of a 10-state region for the NAACP.
"The numbers basically reflect that there is a problem," Ford added. "The unfortunate piece is that Missouri has a law that causes them to collect the data, and the dilemma is they don't do anything once they collect it - everybody makes excuses."
The statewide total of more than 1.5 million traffic stops in 2005 was up from 1.37 million the previous year, an increase of about 10 percent. Nixon said part of that may be attributable to a change in law that took effect in August 2004 requiring the reporting of a wider variety of stops.
This year's report used 2005 census estimates compiled by Geolytics Inc. Previous reports used population figures from the 2000 census.
Posted by: MICHAEL OATES | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 07:03 PM
HEY PLATTECO, no matter how you try to spin it republicans hate unions and are stictly for management not the average worker.
Posted by: EWAT | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 07:49 PM
With all due respect,if the unions would throw their votes to the GOP ,I doubt you would see very little hate from them. Could it be that alittle IF YOU CANT BEATEM JOINEM would be in order.
Posted by: monty | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 08:01 PM
how many white people on here hate to have a black boss? c'mon be honest. dont it just burn you up to have a black telling you what to do? these are the things whites need to take respnsibility for. you need to look at yourself in this area and work on trying to rid yorself of that cause it contributes to the problem.
Posted by: ewat | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 08:55 PM
Absolutely not, I do what I'm told. I had a black teacher last year, and though he was black and about 6'5", I obeyed him. Now quit making racially beligerant comments and focus on the issue, noob.
Posted by: plattecohighschooler | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 09:18 PM
Anyways, what's that got to do with Jason Whitlock's column.
Posted by: plattecohighschooler | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 09:22 PM
And, oh yeah, WE'LL BEAT 'EM.
Posted by: plattecohighschooler | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 09:23 PM
I think it's an attitude or mindset problem that spans across all races and cultures.
My mom and dad's families were poor, but they didn't commit crimes. I don't remember any of them saying anything unkind about another person no matter what their genetic expression or how much money they appeared to have.
Posted by: ***** | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 09:54 PM
thank you platteco, thank you for being honest. my message is to those who are not. i'm simply pointing out things that are wrong in both races.
blacks have things they need to take responsibility for and so do whites. my point is this, one of the things whiteslike to say is "why don't they get a job," when talking about certain black people. but when they do get a job theyre met with all kind of racism and resistance on that job, like whites not wanting you to learn a certain job which the white must teach the black. these attitudes contribute to the quote unquote black problem.
Posted by: Reminder - EWAT | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 10:20 PM
Too bad you didnt sign your post
Posted by: John Boy | Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 10:43 PM
To the comments about my previous post:
I just think its weird to compare modern poverty to slavery. To me its not the same formula and I have never heard of Harriet Tubman freeing slaves at gunpoint. I'm pretty sure it did not take that much convincing.
And the diffrence between somebody like Bill Cosby and Malcolm X is, people like King and Malcolm X not only talked the talk, but also headed massive organizations that put peopele to work or got them involved in the political system. Bill Cosby like all suppoused leaders since the 1960's (think Al Sharpton) just uses his platform (in my opinion) to kick people when they are down.
I'm not saying he's not right about some things, but crime and poverty in the inner city aren't exactly new phenomena. Bill Cosby making speeches is not going to fix the kc school distric per se. Bill Cosby using his wealth to put poor kids into college or creating jobs like Magic Johnson, is a better idea.
Posted by: J-Sizzle | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 01:57 AM
Monty, thanks for the compliment. I guess I have been working two/three jobs to get two kids through college and pay for one wedding. It was worth it though!
Posted by: Nicki | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 05:14 AM
This letter was posted in the Star's letters to the editors a few weeks ago:
"When I read Gertrude Brandy’s letter (5/8), I paused and read it again. Yes, she did indeed write, We, or our ancestors, have all been immigrants, except our native American Indians.
I am black. My ancestors came over here to this country as slaves, chained in the holds of ships. Many died. I felt compelled to enlighten Ms. Brandy.
We black people are still in the process of trying to obtain full citizenship in America."
The Star wouldn't print my response to this letter. The last sentence says it all about this woman's attitude. And that's what Cosby was talking about. Blacks have the same rights of citizenship as any other American.
The quickest way to alienate whites is to whine about a nonexistent inequality and try to lay a guilt trip about slavery.
Posted by: oldrnsin | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 06:52 AM
hey J-Sizzle you can't change what you don't acknowledge. bill cosby is just the messenger. don't hate the messenger.
and this statment:
"I'm not saying he's not right about some things."
what are the things he's right about? let's have a discussion about the things he's right about then.
bill cosby doesnt have to spend his money sending black folk to college just to prove something to you. all he's responsible for his own family. get up off your azz and send yourself and your family to college. if bill spent all his money on black folk they would call him stupid and laugh at him behind his back. that's just how ignorant some black folk are.
Posted by: ewat | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 07:59 AM
So many great points and comments here. I'd like to add from personal experience that while i grew up in a terribly poor family and community. In a third world country with no welfare system, no government help and a proportionately higher crime rate. I also had a young father that did nothing, never around and a mother that made poor choices, had too many (8)children and no college or high school degree. My path was destined to become a statistic, a youth who would have no degree, many kids i can't support and either sell drugs or commit crimes. If you told anyone i'd have 3 degrees, be working on an MBA, coaching kids soccer in the community, have a wife and children in a very nice house, they would laugh you to scorn. But i have this, and i'm considered a role model by many kids.
How? Deep down inside every one has that desire to be somebody and achieve success. You just need people in the community to bring that desire out. The youths i grew up with had that desire. The only difference is that they only saw limited ways to success. Become a rap artist, sell drugs or play soccer. The older you become the more you understand that statistically in that community it was very far fetched. But I was lucky to be surrounded by positive male role models and i was a very skilled athlete. I was able to use this skill and the motivation to succeed like my role models to become successful.
Bill Cosby is right. You can't better yourself if you "accept" the destiny society or the media or statistics put on you. No matter what race you are from. However, we cannot deny that it is tougher for minorities. Its not just poverty. Its poverty and the way society handles it. Some of us need to spend some time with these youths before commenting. Some of us say we were poor, but c'mon now. Were you really truly poor? I've done a little of this and boy, you have some kids that may have been brainwashed, given up or something. But they have that strong conviction that their life is destined to doom, unless they become a rap star, push drugs or through sports. Bill Cosby's message seem's like a motivational tool to me. He may not be spending money but at least he's saying something that i'm sure at least one poor soul might use to empower himself/herself to at least try. I don't see why people are criticizing him for this. As opposed to the artist telling them how many grams they pushed to make it out of the ghetto. As opposed to the media for glamorizing athletes and celebrities as if this is going to help many kids out of the slum. As opposed to the system that hands out a welfare check and spends less on education, less on teachers and job creation efforts. As opposed to parents who've given up on trying to teach and push their children to try to achieve success. As opposed to US, who sit down and post articles and spread our views, thinking that this is going to solve the problem.
Thank you Bill for your effort.
Posted by: Mario | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 08:34 AM
We are ALL americans. Color of skin in my eyes should NEVER be a factor.
Posted by: christina | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 08:36 AM
People have to be willing to work their way out of poor situations. I am a single mother of three. I was married, he was abusive. Even now that we are divorced i still have to deal with him. I am currently working on my Bachelors degree so i am going to college full time. I work a full time job. I am a soldier in the Army. I get one day off a month. IT CAN BE DONE.
Posted by: christina | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 08:39 AM
Here we go another black man putting us down. Ewat you are right, Mr. Cosby should not spend his money sending anyones children to school. Why sit your big azz watching tv, listening to other millionairs thinking I care about what you think.
This is not the 50's, 60's or 70's, the times has changed and the inner cities are not like they were when Mr. Cosby was young, how many times have he came face to face with the teenagers today, how many times have he walked into battered women shalter and how many times have he walked into the intensive care unit of a children's hospital. All of these things play apart to the mindset of a child that had to endure them.
When Mr. Cosby show me that he has accomplished these things, then and only then I will listen. I deal with teenagers that have been abandon by there parents, ranaway for the abuse at home to be abused in the streets. Do you not believe all of these things play a part in the state of mind of an adult who's life was surround by such torment, if you can not find some kind of support system in this world you become what so many adults become, a drug addict, alcholic or a long term prisoner.
You want to get my attention; tell me of the things you have seen and the people you have spoke too, and I am not talking about people with money but those who are living the every day grind.
Posted by: Maxine | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 08:55 AM
MAxine, I honor what you do! I recently was deployed to Bosnia, the children there go through similar things here. However they do not have people like you to be there for them. I met two 8 yr old boys that lost their parents. They luive in old abondoned houses and eat out of trash cans. They do what they do what they ahve to do to survive. A pencil to a bosnian child is like recieving gold. You give a pencil to an american child as a gift and they will look at you like you are stupid. I am glad there are people like you MAxine That care about our youth enough to help them.
Posted by: christina | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 09:00 AM
openmind:
OK...where here's a few more things that I can pose to you. Those figures suggest that blacks comprise 13 percent of all drug arrests...blacks comprise 10-15 percent of the population. I'm sorry, I don't think that's accurate. The idea that drug-using blacks comprise a proportionate amount of drug-users (and how exactly did they measure that, I'm curious) but comprise that much of a portion of the convictions and jailed men/women is a bit of a stretch.
It also doesn't account for people that are arrested more than once nor does it break it down by the drug of choice. I'm willing to bet that most white people caught with drugs have weed....which carries a pretty minor consequence unless you have a ton of it. Crack and heroin on the other hand will get you sent to jail every damn time. I don't know the "drug of choice" broken down by race, but I would assume that hard drug use (meth, heroin, crack, etc.) is more pervasive amongst the poor...which disproportionately affects blacks....which again makes me question the 13 percent figure.
Ewat:
First of all, you do not know what race I am.
Second of all, a boss is a boss....either they're competent or not. I have had minority bosses and I have had women bosses. My assessment of them does not at all focus on their demographics (unless they make it an issue themselves)...as is the case with most people.
Here's a question for you. I presume you're black based on what you've been saying. You have a problem with a white boss? If you do....and the race is why you have a problem...who's the bigot now?
I'm a "working man" and I'm not unionized...and I will never vote Democrat if it means voting for a left-winger. The unions are bankrupting GM, Ford, and a good share of the airlines. Pushes are on to unionize Wal-Mart and Starbucks.
I guess I just have pose question...if you don't like a job, how come you just get off your rump and find a better one? I used to work for Wal-Mart...hated it...so I worked hard and when I was able to, I moved on to something better (YEARS ago)
Like it or not, but market is supposed to determine labor rate...not some money-hungry extortionist union that completely ignores the fact that businesses are in business to make money...not be a self-contained social safety net. I won't argue that places like Wal-Mart aren't exactly the best place to work, but to expect them to start you at 12 bucks an hour and give you great insurance when they employ 1.2 million people domestically is a bit stupid, don't you think?
Never mind the fact that Democrats have no interest in people "moving up" the class ladder of life. If there weren't "lower class" Americans, they wouldn't have anyone to vote for them. Why exactly do you think that bloated idiot Teddy Kennedy is parroting the whole immigrant "rights" platform? He's PANDERING!
J-Sizzle:
Al Sharpton/Jesse Jackson are NOTHING like Bill Cosby. Sharpton and Jackson are in the business of making blacks feeling like victims at all times and they try to portray the idea that we still in the 60's. Cosby is urging people to stop blaming others for what they can largely control themselves. Democrats (for the most part) want you to be dependent on the government and have no issue in labeling you as "heartless" if you point out that people in fact do have the ability to make what they want out of life.
Posted by: The Angry Conservative | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 09:10 AM
I think we could all give what I have witnessed testimonies, but the question has not addressed:
WHAT CAN WE DO? HOW CAN WE HELP?
Deal with this and lets figure something out.
Maxine, I have done these things too, but I know I wanted better for my family than what I had, so I went to school and worked and will never stop trying to help inner city kids
Posted by: Jokie McJokemaker | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 09:16 AM
The teenagers today are not blaming anyone for who they are today. To them it is all about getting what you can while you can, the sad thang about that is if they have to die to get it than okay. These children don't care about white, black, green or purple, to them its all about the money.
This is the United States of America and all they hear is if you don't have it then you are nothing, this really tells me that so many of our adults are still stuck in their youth. When are we going to shut our mouths and listen to the children, their concerns for today are not your worries of yesterday.
Posted by: Maxine | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 09:21 AM
Jokie,
I commend you for that; like I said I am a mother of three, I gave birth to my first when I was 18. I have two daughters in UMC and my son is a junior in high School, so I know about fighting to make it but I contribute my success to my children and wanting to give them the life I was denied.
I was abandoned at 14 and the streets was not my friend, my faith and strength was what brought me through but there are so many who are not that fortunate. I have seen so much it is scary, young girls rap and killed, running scared because I did not know if I was next. I was not concerned of who wronged me all I knew I had to survive and blaming people was not going to do that for me.
Posted by: Maxine | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 09:28 AM
Racist, Racist, Racist. That is all you here out of African Americans anymore. The truth of the matter is, Blacks are more racists against whites. Bill Cosby tells the truth, and the African American community doesn't want to here the truth, THE TRUTH HURTS. As a white person that grew up in poverty, I did not resort to drugs, alcohol, robbery, murder, etc. I had two jobs for fifteen years. I went to East High School and remember honky day, being jumped and beaten by (always more than one) African American. Reverse these and their would be racial tentions, who knows Al Sharpton and Jesse may show up. Remember the forty or so blacks that beat that white man to DEATH at 10th and Paseo in the 1990's, NO murder charges by Claire McCaskill, only simple assult. Now reverse that, 40 whites kill an old black man and watch on your TV sets the African American Communities around the country. GET MY POINT YET, or do I need to continue. Bill Cosby should be nominated for the Peace Prize Award. Shut your big trap and listen to what he is saying.
Posted by: E.P. | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 09:53 AM
Angry Conservative,
Way to follow the party lines and ignore factual evidence. I find evidence to support what I say, you tell me what you "feel." Once again, its the same ideals that led us into a war. The below information came from your beloved white house.
"Those figures suggest that blacks comprise 13 percent of all drug arrests...blacks comprise 10-15 percent of the population. I'm sorry, I don't think that's accurate"
http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/drugfact/minorities/index.html
Arrests & Sentencing
There were a total of 1,745,712 state and local arrests for drug abuse violations in the United States during 2004. Of the 1,745,712 drug abuse violations with race information available, 65.8% of those arrested were white, 32.9% were black, 0.7% were Asian or Pacific Islander, and 0.6% were American Indian or Alaskan Native.8
Of the individuals convicted of felony drug offenses in State courts during 2000, 53% were black and 46% were white. One percent of the offenders were of another race.10
During 2001, there were a total of 1,208,700 sentenced State prison inmates, 246,100 of whom were incarcerated for drug offenses. The majority of drug offenders held in State prisons were black (139,700), followed by whites (57,300), and Hispanics (47,000).11
"An estimated 971 thousand Americans used crack cocaine in 1998. Of those, 462 thousand were White, 324 thousand were Black, and 157 thousand were Hispanic.
Source: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Population Estimates 1998 (Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1999), pp. 37-39.
But you may say that blacks are more likely to sell drugs right?
"On average over the three year period, blacks were 16 percent of admitted sellers and whites were 82 percent. According to research on patterns of drug purchase and use in selected major cities, drug users reported that their main drug sources were sellers of the same racial or ethnic background as they were"-
86 K. Jack Riley, Crack, Powder Cocaine, and Heroin: Drug Purchase and Use Patterns in Six U.S. Cities, Washington D.C.: National Institute of Justice and the Office of National Drug Control Policy, December 1997.
Posted by: openmind | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 09:58 AM
The fact is that even if there were a higher proportion of blacks that did use drugs, that proportion could never be high enough to account for the disparity in the conviction rates and in the prison population.
You suggest that the type of drug used could account for the disparity. While the link I provided demonstrated that drug use is consistent across categories, lets, for the sake of argument assume you are right.
Blacks use crack more and whites use cocaine and meth more. Knowing people who have been used and been addicted to both (I actually get out there like Maxine suggests and interact with people you would never go near) I would say that all three of those drugs are equally devastating. Yet why is the sentencing for crack so disproportionate to the rest?
"The mean average sentence length for powder cocaine is 77 months, compared to 119.5 months for crack cocaine. The median average is 60 months for powder cocaine and 97 months for crack cocaine". 2000 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics, U.S. Sentencing Commission.
The average sentence for crack cocaine (ten years) is thirty-five percent longer than the average methamphetamine sentence and fifty-two percent longer than the average powder cocaine sentence. United States Sentencing Commission, 1999 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics 69
The average crack cocaine sentence, 120 months, is greater than: the 103-month average sentence for robbery; the 76-month average sentence for arson; the 64-month average sentence for sexual abuse; and the 31-month average sentence for manslaughter. United States Sentencing Commission, 1999 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics.
That in and of itself is racist. Now please dont tell me that there is still racism alive and well today, and dont wonder why so many black youths dont trust the justice system. Even if they arent doing anything illegal, they see the injustice going on. I get tired of white males (which I am) being the first in line to say quit complaining about discrimination when they have no idea at all what is goign on. You can "feel" whatever you want, I will continue to "prove" the truth.
Also, Maxine, I think I know you.
Posted by: openmind | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 09:59 AM