The forgotten victims: Wal-Mart photo processing clerks
An Arizona man has pleaded guilty to having sex with one of his dogs. Why do the authorities think he did it? He reportedly took photos and dropped them off at Wal-Mart for processing. (Why he took photos, I have no idea.)
I just wanted to take a moment to reflect on that poor Wal-Mart clerk who cracked open the film canister and spied within the love that dare not bark its name. And who, despite what must have been an unstoppable case of dry heaves and hysterical blindness, was able to call the police. Godspeed, sir. Or ma'am.
Mega-Hat-Tip to eephus!


"the love that dare not bark it's name"
Not sure whether to laugh or cry at that one, James. Very nice.
Posted by: G | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 06:52 AM
I found that one more than funny as well...
Posted by: "The G" | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 08:26 AM
don't most people just kick thier dog?
Posted by: onetime | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 08:41 AM
I can't believe we're wasting taxpayer resources on stuff like this.
Posted by: Scott | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 09:07 AM
I think we should have dateline NBC do a special on this. They could pose as dog owners and lure people in to have sex with their dogs, then confront them.
Of course they'd have to have a van full of detectives in SWAT gear ready to pounce on the sicko as he leaves.
Now that would make some great showbiz. I bet eventually even Miss America would try to cash in on it.
Posted by: jpbikerfreak | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 09:26 AM
This is just SICK!!!!!!!
Posted by: What Ever | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:04 AM
"was accused of having sex with and sexually assaulting at least one of his dogs"
What's the difference?
I guess it wasn't consentual...
Posted by: JJHawq | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:27 AM
poor guy a sexual psycho no doubt.
Posted by: jalovsky | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 11:09 AM
what....
no one ever heard
'Ya screwed the pooch"?
Posted by: Oldman | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 11:27 AM
Good Lord! Deliverance revisited.
Posted by: socogirl | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 11:51 AM
Ahhh....the dog days of summer.
Posted by: OhMy | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 12:31 PM
I assume it was "doggy style."
Posted by: sweetlou | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 12:58 PM
That would make for some "ruff" sex...
Posted by: spicolli | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 01:05 PM
The man should be executed.
Exodus 22:19
Posted by: TT | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 01:50 PM
According to the bible I think just about everyone should be executed TT.
Posted by: jpbikerfreak | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 02:20 PM
Maybe it was consensual.
Don't let Nifong get wind of it -
Posted by: mike | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 02:52 PM
How is this a "wasting taxpayer resources" or do you think its ok for this guy to be doing it doggie style with a doggie?
If this guy is this sick I think its a safe bet to say we all are safer with him behind bars.
Sick, somewhat funny or sad......no no just sick.
Posted by: DSW | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 03:23 PM
It may be sick but apparently it is not a crime in his state. Now what?
Posted by: | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 03:35 PM
what scares me more than a guy nailing his pooch is that photo clerks have the ability to look at your photos then call the cops and get you arrested?
THAT IS JUST SCARY? And isnt that an invasion of privacy?
Where does it stop? Are they going to call the cops if they see a pipe in the background of a party pic?
Makes me glad I have a digital camera and do my photos myself!
Posted by: BoulderBabe | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 04:33 PM
I wonder if there was any fore play and oral sex. Maybe not fore play it's four paws
Posted by: EP | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 04:37 PM
RE: BoulderBabe
You give up the right to personal privacy when you give them your photos. If you are breaking the law, they have the obligation to call the cops.
If you are putting a child or pet in danger, they should call the cops. Buy a digital camera if you want to photograph yourself doing illegal stuff.
Posted by: okobojicat | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 04:41 PM
"Bark!" means "No!"
Posted by: Gromit | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 04:43 PM
Just because he worked at Walmart does not give him the right to take pictures of people having sex with his parrot and post it on the interweb where children can find thems.
Posted by: Turkey | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 04:46 PM
Does this mean we're finally going to hear the end of that whole "Who let the dogs out" crap?
Posted by: Jim | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 04:47 PM
Buy a digital camera if you want to photograph yourself doing illegal stuff.
That hardly helps you if you want a nice 8x10 for the dog's parents, though...
Posted by: Jim | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 04:48 PM
1. why do you feel he worked at Wal-Mart?
2. how do you have sex with a parrot exactly?
3. What is the 'interweb?'
I do agree that IF there was a clerk at Wal-Mart, and IF that clerk happened to take a photo of someone having sex with a parrot, and IF they then posted it within reach of children on the 'interweb' he would definitely be violating someone's rights. But since this hypothetical has nothing to do with the story, I'm not sure why I'm still talking about it, so I'll just stop.
Posted by: huh? | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 04:49 PM
I had friends that got busted this way in high school for stealing all of the 69th St and 69th Ave signs off of gravel roads. They took pictures, got busted, and had to pay something like $200 for every sign they could identify in the pictures, it was bad.
Posted by: cooper1178 | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 04:51 PM
It was correct in the article, then the 1st comment has "it's" instead of "its." Is it sooo hard to cut and paste?
Posted by: Alan West | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 04:54 PM
I love it when criminals take pictures of themselves doing illegal things ... it's called evidence and it helps the entire process along. I therefore encourage all criminals to frequently take as many photos of themselves as possible. You're out there anyway, go ahead and make some memories.
Posted by: mike | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 04:56 PM
OKIBOJICAT-
I am amazed that you can type since you obviously can't read....
you are going to tell me to get a digital camera when at the end of my post I clearly wrote that I am glad I have my own digital camera....
Posted by: BoulderBabe | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 04:57 PM
BoulderBabe - that post is called 'flamebait.' It's when you miss the point of the original post and go off on a tangent to bait the other poster into an argument.
Posted by: mike | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 05:00 PM
Does 'doggie style' mean he sits up and begs and she rolls over and plays dead? What does that say about the women he's been seeing? lol!
Posted by: Sandra | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 05:02 PM
**sniffs** I smell farkers, and dog farkers.
James, great headline. I loved it!
Posted by: You're a Mean Drunk R2D2™ | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 05:07 PM
This is just bringing animal husbandry to an absurd level...
Posted by: Jim | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 05:15 PM
maybe the dog got him drunk and took advantage of him.
Posted by: PLEASE SIGN YOUR COMMENTS! | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 05:28 PM
This was the same guy who walked out on his lap dances!!
Posted by: RMZ | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 05:30 PM
Sexually assaulting?
Come on! The way that dog was groomed, she was asking for it.
Posted by: Woofman Jack | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 05:51 PM
in response to someone who asked if the clerks looking at his photos was an invasion of privacy... no. Constitutionally, our privacy is protected only from the Government. There are no privacy laws that keep other citizens from sniffing around our business.
Posted by: not an invasion of privacy | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 05:52 PM
There will be a lawsuit over this one.
Posted by: Malcolm | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 05:52 PM
I once saw pics that were questionable at best of a woman and her daughter...but walmart refused to call the cops and I did personally. I was unceremoniously released from my duties a short time later.
Posted by: Jerk | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 05:57 PM
let us not forget Mr. Buble
Posted by: sklurben | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 06:00 PM
EP
That's just gross! haha
Posted by: Amber | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 06:44 PM
Sandra | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 05:02 PM
**sniffs** I smell farkers, and dog farkers.
Yeah, sorry about that, I couldn't resist.
Posted by: Megain | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 08:06 PM
Whew! What a reaction! FYI, the AZ sodomy law was repealed back in 2001 but the bestiality part has apparently been reinstated. Anyway, they charged this guy with "felony animal cruelty", for which this little incident certainly qualifies.
Posted by: eephus | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 08:16 PM
I used to work for a Wal-mart photolab, and yes you see sick stuff sometimes, but that takes the cake.
Posted by: Angela | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 08:17 PM
Brings a whole new meaning to givin' the dog a bone.
Posted by: Bruce | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 08:37 PM
Teaching an old dog new tricks.
Posted by: kcskip | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 09:45 PM
Maybe should of bought that new digital camera he was thinking of..............
Posted by: Doc™ | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:36 PM
How in the world can this be called animal cruelty? The dog had a smile on his face.
Posted by: Malcolm | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:36 PM
As a person that works in a photo lab. Walmart has guidelines and we must report activity like this to the manager and then the call the police. I have reported several sex and physcal abuse to managers and they have taken action. So be happy at least someone is looking for these sick people cuz next he could have come after someone.
Posted by: jac | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:48 PM
so did the dog get a restraining order or just a new leash on life??
Posted by: farker | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 03:44 AM
Actually, this guy has it figured out. There are so many reasons why a dog is better than a girlfriend -
* Dogs love it when your friends come over.
* Dogs don't care if you use their shampoo.
* Dogs think you sing great.
* A dog's time in the bathroom is confined to a quick drink.
* Dogs don't expect you to call when you're running late. The later you are, the more excited they are to see you.
* Dogs will forgive you for playing with other dogs.
* Dogs don't notice if you call them by another dog's name.
* Dogs don't mind if you give their offspring away.
* Dogs love red meat.
* Anyone can get a good looking dog.
* If a dog is gorgeous, other dogs don't hate it.
* Dogs don't shop.
* Dogs like it when you leave lots of stuff on the floor.
* A dog's disposition stays the same throughout the entire month.
* Dogs never need to examine the relationship.
* A dog's parents never visit.
* Dogs understand that instincts are better than asking for directions.
* Dogs don't hate their bodies.
* No dog ever put on 100 pounds after reaching adulthood.
* Dogs agree that you have to raise your voice to get your point across.
* Dogs don't care about or get jealous of any other dog you ever had.
* Dogs like to do their snooping outside as opposed to in your wallet desk and the backs of your drawers.
* Dogs don't let magazine articles guide their lives.
* Dogs would rather you buy them a hamburger dinner rather than lobster.
* You never have to wait for a dog. They're always ready to go.
* Dogs have no use for flowers, cards, or jewelry.
* Dogs don't borrow your shirts.
* Dogs aren't catty.
* Dogs seldom outlive you.
Posted by: snarky | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 04:05 AM
Guess he took the meaning of the word b**** too literally.
Posted by: | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 04:13 AM
No one has answered the important question- did they get stuck together afterward?!
Posted by: Curious | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 04:58 AM
["The love that dare not bark it's name" (sic, see top)] Not sure what's worse: a guy who has sex with his dog then takes the film into WalMart for processing, or the poster who reads about the guy who has sex with his dog, etc., next spies James's clever referencing of an 1896 poem by Lord Alfred Douglas in re: Oscar Wilde, but then cannot so much as copy verbatim the phrase and winds up sticking in (no pun) an unnecessary possessive apostrophe. [Conclusion: a rare link between bad grammar and an interest in interspecial sex and/or overblown phrases from 19th c. poems has been exposed. Or over-exposed.]
Posted by: apres moi le deluge | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 08:07 AM
Are you the kid that just won the national spelling bee, cuz that's some "Jeopardy: Rainman Edition" stuff right there.
Just wishing I had never clicked on this.
Posted by: I Know | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 08:20 AM
A FUN SPORT...MY PROBLEM IS LOOSING MY"MANHOOD" WHEN I GET OFF AND MOVE TO THE FRONT TO KISS HER....LOL
Posted by: ROBERT VERMILLION | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 08:37 AM
Is that a milk bone in your pocket, or are you just excited to see me?
Posted by: bbgunn | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 08:48 AM
Iv'e heard of women doing this too. Don't know of any personally but Iv'e heard about it. They go as far as dogs, horeses, donkeys. Men are not the only sick ones.
Posted by: Imprtnrd | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 09:23 AM
Guess he gave the dog a boner
Posted by: namnoc | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 09:31 AM
For all of you who think it's funny, then let someone screw you in the ass and see if it's funny. It doesn't matter if it was a dog or not. It was sick.
Posted by: Tina | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 10:51 AM
film?
.
.
.
what's that?
Posted by: john of sparta | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 07:47 PM
re:BoulderBabe
Do you think the pictures come out by magic?
Of course they have to look at them! Someone has print the pictures and package the prints.
And everyone photo lab is required to contact the police if children or animals are involved.
Posted by: | Tuesday, July 17, 2007 at 06:45 PM