"We either walk out of here free or we die."
That's what Ed Brown said during a press conference Monday. Brown and his wife were convicted earlier this year for not paying more than $1 million in income tax -- a law, by the way, they do not recognize. ( "There is no law. We looked and looked.")
Since the conviction, the Browns have holed up in their New Hampshire home, and the feds have been trying to talk them out -- without, they say, the threat of violence. Last week, the authorities cut off the Browns' power, phone and Internet, though the Browns say they have backup systems in place.
Photo via The AP. Behind Brown? Randy Weaver, survivor of the Ruby Ridge standoff.




Come on you idiot, pay your tax bill like the rest of us and get on with your life.
Posted by: A | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 06:00 AM
Some people think he's a hero, A. Some really gullible people.
Posted by: G | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 06:51 AM
Over a hundred million a day on a war that nobody wants. Bush wanting to cut social programs to save money (LOL!). I don't blame the guy for not paying taxes. Why do the masses have to pay for the games of the wealthy and which only benefit the wealthy. I say f@$# the IRS.
Oop's I am probably being audited now!
Posted by: unnamed assailant | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 08:34 AM
I can see why...shoot what's his name...Randy Quaid? played Weaver in the movie. Looks alike. Can you really not find a law saying pay your taxes?
Posted by: onetime | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 08:38 AM
There is NO LAW people! Watch the movie "America: Freedom to Fascism" on Google Video or YouTube FOR FREE to see where Ed & Elaine are coming from. The movie includes several IRS employees who, out of good conscience, had to quit the IRS when they found that there is NO LAW that forces people to pay the FEDERAL INCOME TAX.
Wake up folks! Educate yourselves!
Posted by: Anthony | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 08:53 AM
It's quiet simple. Just post or show the law that describes the constitutional reason for the Federal government to be able to seize a part of our labor by force. If there's no law, then those that advocate for the government's position are merely agreeing with the old feudal adage that Might Makes Right.
America was supposed to be a moving away from feudalism, wasn't it?
Posted by: Jim Depkin | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 08:59 AM
Income tax is theft at best, fractional slavery at worst.
Unfortunately for these people they can't read. The 16th amendment legalizes theft and fractional slavery, and paved the way for a domestic terrorist organization known as the IRS.
Let's repeal the 16th legally and do away with the IRS through democratic means.
If anyone really cares?
Posted by: jpbikerfreak | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 08:59 AM
jpbikerfreak said: "a domestic terrorist organization known as the IRS."
The IRS functions in America as the KGB did in Russia. It's an intelligence gathering operation used to stifle dissent and opposition to centralized government power.
Posted by: Jim Depkin | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 09:23 AM
Agreed, Jim.
Without it the feds have very little power. With it, they have the power to destroy whomever they choose. After all, the power to tax is the power to destroy, right?
Just look at the drug issues. The feds have no authority to outlaw drugs, so they passed a tax on them, then never issue the tax stamps. You get nailed for tax evasion at the federal level, not posession.
And I don't believe any human being alive understands the Internal Revenue Code. It's completely a matter of interpretation. As Albert Einstein once said, (paraphrased) "There is nothing so impeneterable to the human mind as the U.S. Tax Code".
Posted by: jpbikerfreak | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 09:48 AM
"And I don't believe any human being alive understands the Internal Revenue Code."
The IR Code is purposefully cumbersome and vague so that any IRS agent can find any excuse in the tax code to bust any citizen they have their eyes on.
Posted by: Jim Depkin | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:01 AM
Mention federal taxes and the whacko's come out of the woodwork.
IRS is now the KGB. God I love it. How about, the people who buck the tax system are the nutjobs that lend themselves to these types of headlines.
I believe they bring it upon themselves as opposed to the IRS seeking them out, wouldn't you? After all, he didn't pay his taxes. Now its their job to go make him pay.
Granted, they'll quickly surpass the million dollar mark getting it from him, but that's never been the point before.
Posted by: I Know | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:35 AM
Whacko... nutjob... great way to win a deabte there, I know.
Anyone who opposes our current punative system of taxation must be a nutjob? Why?
We got along just fine without it for about 137 years... I guess everyone from 1776 to 1913 is a nut job?
Wow, thankfully normal, rational, sane people came to the rescue and created the 16th amendment!
Posted by: jpbikerfreak | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:42 AM
Ironic that the document he quotes "the constitution" is the very document that empowers the government to tax incomes.
His argument should be that the 16th ammendment is unconstitutional...
Posted by: JJHawq | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:43 AM
Agreed, JJhawg. That's the real problem.
Question for all you who like our current system:
Would you go to your neighbor and take part of his income by force, to re-distribute to whatever programs you see fit? If not, why do you expect your government to do it for you?
It's theft. It matters not who does the stealing... you or your government. At least have the gall to steal it yourself.
Posted by: jpbikerfreak | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:46 AM
Here is a 3 minute clip that will put this in perspective:
Now we see the violence inherent in the system
Posted by: aqua | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:54 AM
Yeah, that's brilliant. Get rid of the IRS overnight. Uh...do you honestly have any idea of the amount of federal funding that goes into public schools, road construction, healthcare, etc etc etc? If we yanked the plug on the IRS without a solid plan, we would be screwed...oh but wait, we'd have more money in our pockets. Brilliant.
Posted by: Steve in KC | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:58 AM
What a bunch of hippie liberals. These people are always the ones that are trying to overpower/over throw the government, but are first in line to take the handouts.
pure junk
Posted by: tired | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:59 AM
Road construction could be supported with user fees... such as car registration and the gasoline tax.
AS for social programs, I'm all for eliminating them. Private charities do a much better job than our welfare state could ever hope to. Separation of education and state is also not a bad idea. Private schools can educate our kids better for less than half the tuition charged by our failing public schools.
I suppose we should all just be thankful we don't get all the government we pay for, because the more the government gets involved the more screwed up and expensive everything gets.
Tired, I'm not a hippie, nor am I a liberal, nor have I ever received a dime of welfare money.
Posted by: jpbikerfreak | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 11:03 AM
Well, nutjobs and whackos they are. Sorry.
Oppose the tax system? I never said the like. Sure the tax system is broke. But you still gotta play by the rules. I'd fully support a very streamlined tax code.
What worked 100 to 200 years ago couldn't imaginably work now and most likely wouldn't work another 100 years from now. You don't honestly believe your own racket do you? Imagine what taxes covered 200 years ago. Interstates, advanced military, schools, federal programs too lengthy to even imagine listing? No, don't think so. If you believe any government can survive on tax principals from two centuries ago, refer to my very first sentence.
If you think federal taxes are so unjust, I'd encourage you to avoid everything in your life made possible by taxes. If you don't pay, you shouldn't have the right to use the services. And that's just about everything in your life.
The 16th amendment is very simple and just. Its the politicians that muddy it up, as they do everything.
I'll never argue that the government does everything right or even anything perfectly or that it isn't corrupt and filled with waste. But it is what it is and without actual useful services that are provided, life as known today would be impossible.
Pay up and move on. If you can derive a better system that helps more people with less waste, please do so, I'd like to save some money. Until then, I'll keep complaining and paying.
Posted by: I Know | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 11:17 AM
The 16th Amendment reads:
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration."
It is a law people. In addition, we have the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. That is law too. Passed by the Congress and signed by the President. Originally Reagan and amended by every one of them since. It is so large that to get a copy in print big enough to read you need two books almost 3 inches thick on very thin paper.
Maybe there are some people out there that believe that some tortured reading of these laws says the IRS cannot collect income taxes. However, these claims have been tried in courts and found not to be valid.
If you don't like the law, then you can use the political system to try to change it. In the meantime, if you don't pay your taxes you will go to jail. That is the price of civil disobedience.
Posted by: CPA | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 11:33 AM
Could it be that those who support the taxing of American citizens make enough money not to feel the dent in their bank accounts? It doesn't matter to them, so no support for us "lower class" that makes this Country what it is. If there is some way to fight this taxation legally and without going to jail. Sign me up! But remember.. as the 16th Amendments states.."The Congress shall have power ,,," Now THAT is scary as he#$.!
Posted by: Gunny | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 11:47 AM
Like it or not, every country has a method of taking monies from the general population and businesses in order to form armies to protect borders, (or expand in some cases), to build schools, roads, bridges, etc.
Does anyone out there really believe that a country could survive without this process? Oh, sure, a few individuals could survive, but could a country?
Either you're an American or not, (music playing in the background), pay your share.
This is not a Bush problem, or Clinton, or FDR or Adams. As jp pointed out it has been a part of our Constitution since 1913.
Our BEEF should be what our Gov't does with the money, not whether they have the right to collect it; (music ends).
Posted by: JDog | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 12:17 PM
I'd love to see the IRS removed and if we do need some taxes, reduce what the government spends on worthless crap that isn't needed and leave my money alone!
Posted by: You're a Mean Drunk R2D2™ | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 12:19 PM
CPA, I'm trying to right it politcally through democratic means. But I get comments like the ones from I know telling me to just shut up and pay the bill... don't use our services.. if you don't like it get the hell out, etc.
It used to be in America you could voice your opinion and ask for change. Now you just get told to leave, branded a wacko, nutjob, etc.
BTW, I know, why don't you think what worked 200 years ago can work today? Who says we need the gargantuan government we currently have?
If we stripped out all the pork, we would still be able to afford the best military in the world, and maintain our place as a superpower.
As it stands right now, I believe about half our money goes just to pay the interest on the federal debt anyway. And that doesn't count the 15% we pay into socialist insecurity (Yes, I said 15, because I count the employer's half). and medicaire / medicaid.
The system is headed for collapse under its own weight, just a matter of time.
Posted by: jpbikerfreak | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 12:32 PM
Personally, I think I'd rather pay my taxes than die.....but that's just me.
Posted by: OhMy | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 12:32 PM
In my Utopia...
Maybe you guys should be a little more realistic??
Posted by: WWW | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 12:36 PM
If you think it's bad now, imagine Obama as President.
Posted by: KC Brougham | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 12:38 PM
Hillary: "We need to hit those 401Ks HARD!"
Posted by: KC Brougham | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 12:40 PM
Jesse Jackson @ democratic convention: We need to take money from pension funds to build houses for people to live!
Posted by: KC Brougham | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 12:42 PM
Oh ya, KC, don't count on getting your money out of your 401k without getting nailed one way or another.
The government is going to figure out a way to get into any pool of money that large just sitting around. Like a pack of wolves guarding sheep...
Posted by: jpbikerfreak | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 12:44 PM
People like Jesse Jackson are good at giving away other people's money. But I don't see him giving up any limo rides or $500.00 suits to build any houses....
Posted by: jpbikerfreak | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 12:49 PM
WHAT!
All of those in favor of the IRS have no idea where the money goes. The direct apportioned tax was deemed illegal in the constitution but over ruled by the 16th amendment. It is time to limit gov't spending, and by taking our hard earned money back we can do just that. As for those who belive that tax money pays for anything ask the school districts where all that "gambling tax" money went. For those who think that Dem's raise taxes and Repb's don't... Bush has raised taxes by 436 BILLION dollars to date and maintained tax breaks for the oil industry and airline industry...
Posted by: KCPowerGuy | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 01:15 PM
Jim Depkin: "Just post or show the law that describes the constitutional reason for the Federal government to be able to seize a part of our labor by force."
How about the 16th Amendment to the Constitution and Title 26 of the US Code?
SHHHHPANK!!! What's that sound? It's the sound of Jimmy's butt getting spanked, and him running home crying to his mommy. You lose. You and your dippie-hippie, patchouli smelling friends. Want roads? Schools? Police? Internet? Broadcast TV? Protection? Then you sit down, you shut up, you pay your taxes, and you do what your betters tell you.
PWNT!
Posted by: Holden McCrank | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 01:25 PM
"All the property that is necessary to a man for the conservation of the individual and the propagation of the species is his natural right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all property superfluous to such purposes is the property of the public, who by their laws have created it, and who may therefore by other laws dispose of it, whenever the welfare of the public shall demand such disposition. He that does not like civil society on these terms, let him retire and live among savages."
Benjamin Franklin (hippy liberal)
Letter to Robert Morris, 1783
Posted by: bob | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 01:45 PM
Good lord, you guys are hi-larious.
Uh, guess what? NO ONE is in charge. Your government (you) stumbles around doing what it has always done until it runs into a brick wall. Then they change direction semi-randomly and start over.
Meanwhile, babies die (highest infant mortality rate in the so-called developed world. Go USA!) and the oil flows.
Thanks for playing.
Posted by: Semi-anon | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 01:45 PM
Uh, Semi-anon, you do realize that the reason we have high infant mortality rate is due to the fact that we shovel "defective" babies into neonatal care, whereas other countries don't and count them as "stillborn," which is a different category for them.
That high infant mortality rate for the US is a long-descredited urban legend, entirely due to differences in how we count things.
Thanks for playing, but you lose.
Posted by: Onan the Barbarian | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 01:59 PM
Another crank, but this time one that is threatening violence. Just shoot him and be done with it.
Posted by: Ceronomus | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 02:01 PM
Who is threatening violence, ceromonus?
Posted by: jpbikerfreak | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 02:07 PM
America is a great country, but you can't live in it for free.
And, if you could, it wouldn't be so great! I promise...
Posted by: Chris | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 02:12 PM
I don't think anyone wants to live in it for free, Chris. Some of us just don't like income tax.
User fees, sales tax, tarriffs, use taxes, etc., are all fine in my book. But don't force me into fractional slavery.
Posted by: jpbikerfreak | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 02:14 PM
I am a 60 yr old, single male, employed full time by a small privately owned company and my tax liability usually runs around 25% of my total income. I have heard (no factual confirmation) that a great many multi-billion dollar corps have a similar liability that works out to about 6-8% of the corps' annual income (this due to a plethora of loopholes and deductions and "special arrangements"). Again, I don't have any proof of this but I'm sure the proof is available. What's the problem with a flat, across the board 15% tax on all individuals and corporations? No deductions, no loopholes, no special treatment.
Just a loosely organized thought.
Posted by: Dan | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 02:14 PM
Another wild-eyed wacko joins the discussion... LOL.
It'll never happen, Dan. That takes away all the power of the feds to be social engineers, plus give breaks and kickbacks to their buddies.
Posted by: jpbikerfreak | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 02:19 PM
It wasn't until the Jew bankers talked our government into getting off the gold standard did the shit hit the fan.
Posted by: Churchhills_dog | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 02:19 PM
You know if you were african american living in pre 1965 USA, you'd be pretty thankful for the federal government. Likewise, had the USSR army come aross Alaska in the 1980's you sure would appreciate the US military... Look, all I'm saying is that you get what you pay for, they don't pay much in taxes in Sudan, do they?
Posted by: Chris | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 02:49 PM
I'll give you your first two points, Chris. But again, it doesn't have to be funded through income tax.
Using other countries as examples is always dangerous. But, countries aren't made great by oppressive taxation, that's for sure.
And btw, DAn, you're paying CONSIDERABLY more than 25%... if you add up everything, it's probably more like 60%.
Posted by: jpbikerfreak | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 02:54 PM
"What a bunch of hippie liberals. These people are always the ones that are trying to overpower/over throw the government, but are first in line to take the handouts.
pure junk" . . .
um, yeah... just so you know - it's usually the conservatives/Republicans that are against taxation Steve in KC. We need taxes to fund things like schools, roads, etc. Unfortunately the money is NOT being put to good use right now. There's a difference in the reasons people are not paying taxes - some, like these people, think it's unconsitutional or just not a law. Others are doing it now b/c they oppose the war and what our money is being used for. Don't blame the liberals for this one buddy, I guarantee more of your own people are against taxes. Why do you think the uber-rich (and more likely, Republicans) get the tax cuts why the people in the middle get the crap taxed out of them. But then you little pawns just follow along now don't you? And blame the liberals. What a load of crap!
Posted by: you're a numbskull | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 02:54 PM
To the comment about the 16th amendment legalizing income taxes. Numerous Supreme Court decisions can be found that show it does not allow for a tax on labor. This is un-disputed. The reason that the Brown's stopped attending their trial is because the Judge refused to let them bring in those cases as evidence. The government is lying. Brown is a Patriot.
Posted by: butler | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 03:00 PM
Just wondering where Elaine studied dentistry. I hope none of my income taxes went to subsidize the school that she earned her degree that she used to make 200K+ a year. If so I want my money back. Even private schools get tax breaks/financial support from the gov't, so she had no problem using the tax payers money when she needed it.
Posted by: cwha | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 03:28 PM
Oddly enough I don't much mind paying (reasonable) federal taxes - I support the idea of medicare, social security, a strong military, environmental protections and regulations protecting food and medicine... Of course there are pet projects and wasteful spending that is unjustified, but I'd focus on that instead of just dismissing the whole idea of a federal system of government supported by taxation.
But you're right, we are probably paying closer to like 60% in fees and taxes - that's a lot of waste and I'd love to see that brought under control.
Posted by: Chris | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 03:47 PM
First, even though I am a tax accountant I am not a big fan of the IRS, or of the way our government spends the money.
Second, all you folks who accuse "wealthy" people of loving the IRS should know that that I pay more in just federal income tax in a year than most low income people earn. But I don't mind, because I feel blessed to make that kind of money and there was a time when I lived from hand to mouth as well. I do remember what that was like.
I think the current system is unworkable and I do not expect to ever collect my social security, so I save like mad.
Finally, I don't call people names because that does nothing to advance my ideas. But... Brown is not a Patriot. We live in a society of laws. If there really were "numerous" Supreme Court decisions stating that the constitution does not allow a tax on labor, the lower courts would be required to follow them. And by that I mean clearly stated, because of course, even Supreme Court decisions are subject to interpretation by the lower courts.
You can't just take one little comment in a court case about something else (often called dicta in legal terms) and go, a ha, they can't due that. I suspect that is why the judge is not allowing it. Furthermore, do you have any idea how many people have tried to advance these same arguements and have been struck down, not by one judge, but doezens, maybe hundreds over the years. Legally these arguements do not stand up.
If you really believe that the system needs to be changed. Register to vote. Join a political movement. Support a candidate. Don't refuse to participate in a court case and try to make yourself a martyr. Too many gulible people have believed the crap spewed by the anti-IRS crowd and been hurt by it. If the Browns really believe they are being wronged, the cost of their civil disobedience is jail. Anything else is just putting others at risk.
Posted by: CPA | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 03:48 PM
First, even though I am a tax accountant I am not a big fan of the IRS, or of the way our government spends the money.
Second, all you folks who accuse "wealthy" people of loving the IRS should know that that I pay more in just federal income tax in a year than most low income people earn. But I don't mind, because I feel blessed to make that kind of money and there was a time when I lived from hand to mouth as well. I do remember what that was like.
I think the current system is unworkable and I do not expect to ever collect my social security, so I save like mad.
Finally, I don't call people names because that does nothing to advance my ideas. But... Brown is not a Patriot. We live in a society of laws. If there really were "numerous" Supreme Court decisions stating that the constitution does not allow a tax on labor, the lower courts would be required to follow them. And by that I mean clearly stated, because of course, even Supreme Court decisions are subject to interpretation by the lower courts.
You can't just take one little comment in a court case about something else (often called dicta in legal terms) and go, a ha, they can't due that. I suspect that is why the judge is not allowing it. Furthermore, do you have any idea how many people have tried to advance these same arguements and have been struck down, not by one judge, but doezens, maybe hundreds over the years. Legally these arguements do not stand up.
If you really believe that the system needs to be changed. Register to vote. Join a political movement. Support a candidate. Don't refuse to participate in a court case and try to make yourself a martyr. Too many gulible people have believed the crap spewed by the anti-IRS crowd and been hurt by it. If the Browns really believe they are being wronged, the cost of their civil disobedience is jail. Anything else is just putting others at risk.
Posted by: CPA | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 03:49 PM
Unnamed Assailant, you're complainging of Bush cutting social programs. That's the only good thing he's done. Do you want a country full of dead beats?
Posted by: Dirtyron | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 03:55 PM
Thank you, Red States, for fostering these great minds! Amen.
Posted by: Gregory A. Swarthout | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 04:01 PM
> Numerous Supreme Court decisions can be
> found that show it does not allow for a tax
> on labor. This is un-disputed.
Undisputed, possibly, but beside the point. Labor isn't taxed. It's the income earned from your labor that is taxed.
Posted by: Voice of Reason | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 04:06 PM
I was wondering who to blame for all the problems the United States has. Thank God this fellow pointed out that its the freemasons. I had long suspected such but this was real confirmation.
Posted by: The Zipper | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 04:19 PM
Uh, to chris: Well, it IS free. Why do you think so many chicanos are coming in...
Another thing...can we count Bush as an "undesirable" and have him eliminated? I mean he looks like a bobble head when he talks his bullcrap anyway.
Posted by: Mickey Mouse | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 04:31 PM
So none of the people who support the income tax can tell us which law actually requires us to pay it.
The Browns are trying to make the point that this law doesn't exist. Nothing forces judges to render their decisions according to laws that are on the books, so court cases where the judges rules that they must pay don't count. The people who prosecuted the Browns should have cited the exact line and verse. Someone show me where they did that. I think that they are citing law out of thin air.
What other valid conclusions might be made? If they refuse to cite the law are they playing games with us?
Posted by: Thomas Kirby | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 04:57 PM
I agree with CPA. My husband and I may considered to be wealthy...we pay a considerable amount of money a year in taxes but I don't question our need to pay them. This country couldn't survive without income tax. Studies have shown that a multitude of use taxes would actually be worse for working class Americans. You think you're nickle and dimed now...
Spend your time and effort getting Congress to spend more efficiently instead of going on about getting rid of income tax - it's not going to happen. Better to work with the system to make real change.
And, stop calling people who don't like the IRS liberals, they actually tend to be Libertarians.
Posted by: okay with taxes | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 05:21 PM
> So none of the people who support the income
> tax can tell us which law actually requires
> us to pay it.
16th Amendment to the Constitution
Posted by: | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 05:24 PM
More specifically:
the 1916 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the 1913 income-tax law passed under the Sixteenth Amendment
Posted by: | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 05:43 PM
Bob Dole (R-KS) was campaining for President with completely eliminating the IRS.
"chicanos"
Mickey Mouse, the term 'chicano' refers to California Latinos, not Mexicanos.
Posted by: KC Brougham | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 06:03 PM
Taxes kill countries. Look at England. Anybody seen a British car company lately? How about Sheffield Steel?
Posted by: KC Brougham | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 06:11 PM
Why is it if you're a millionaire and you're CONVICTED of a crime, the police will sit and wait patiently for you to surrender yourself; but if you're a broke-ass nigga livin in the ghetto they will kick your door in and shoot your ass if they even SUSPECT you of a crime?
Funny how that works.
Posted by: Do Not Delete | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 06:48 PM
Watch the movie 'Bulworth' with Warren Beatty and Holly Berry. Beatty plays a politician who explains it, bottomline, to a black church in South Central.
Posted by: KC Brougham | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 07:24 PM
Well some of ya'lls have brought race into this "discussion" - how disgusting - yuck.
Doncha know that those Brown people are probably Johnson County-ites running to the hills to avoid paying their share AND mongering for media attention?
Oh - we are talking about taxes - got sidetracked by the sidetracked.
The truth of the matter is that there would be a civil uprising if the IRS were abolished. How many other places can one go and freeload, file grievances and yell discrimination - and sit on fat asses doing absolutely nothing.
I'm glad my taxes are going to a "good cause" and "employer" ... as I run to the john to barf.
Posted by: jchater | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 08:54 PM
So no one in the country can tell us which law actually requires us to pay the income tax.
Posted by: Thomas Kirby | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 09:15 PM
I thought the only people who were obligated by law to pay taxes were those in US territories like DC and Puerto Rico.
My understanding is that when you sign the W4 you have signed to contract and have agreed to pay taxes. I still have my 1993 1040 booklet that has a statement inside the front cover by Margaret Richardson saying "Thank you for making ours the most successful VOLUNTEER tax system,.".
Posted by: KC Brougham | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 09:21 PM
Did Margaret Richardson ever read George Orwell's 1984?
Posted by: Thomas Kirby | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 09:49 PM
there is no law stating the legality of income tax. it was done in the 1800's to raise money for a war, not intended to be maintained and of course the gov't never let it go, they found a way to suck a living from the very people they were put in office to protect and defend from this sort of thing. This country used to be for the people, by the people now it is for the rich by the rich on the backs of the people. The taxes america fought so hard against at the Boston Tea Party are here now in our lives.
Posted by: gaylene | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:04 PM
History of the U.S. Tax System
Posted by: Doc™ | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:20 PM
When the first income tax law was passed the argument was made that it would not remain at 1% for long and that there was no doubt that it would one day reach 5%. That claim was denounced as being absurd.
For those who don't know who Randy Weaver is, his cabin in the boonies was attacked by federal agents, one of whom shot Weaver's wife in the face killing her while she was armed with only with her small infant. Afterwards the agents taunted Weaver with comments about how his wife was feeling.
It will be interesting to see if they murder these folks. I wish them luck. Figure out sometime just how much you give to the government to piss away, and think of what you could do for your family with that money.
Posted by: Gentle Ben | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:40 PM
Oh, I forgot, they also shot Weaver's son in the back. I believe he was 13 at the time. I don't recall whether or not he lived. Truly a heroic moment in the history of American law enforcement.
Posted by: Gentle Ben | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:42 PM
I understand and am with you. Don't make this violent, create a grass roots movement and get the change you want.
We need passionate people like you to clear the fog that blinds us today. But we do not need pain and suffering.
Posted by: | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:44 PM
"For those who don't know who Randy Weaver is"-Ben
Interesting you mention that Ben. The documentary on that mess was on one of the cable channels just last night. Shame to see what our government has evolved into.
Posted by: Nick | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:45 PM
"Oh, I forgot, they also shot Weaver's son in the back. I believe he was 13 at the time. I don't recall whether or not he lived. Truly a heroic moment in the history of American law enforcement."-Ben
Actually they killed his dog first. Then they killed one son. After that they killed his wife, then shot him and his other son. Yes, his remaining son lived. The only one that they didn't shoot was the daughter.
Posted by: Nick | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:48 PM
And they did the shootings by picking them off like targets, without an actual raid. Snipers hidden in the bushes somehow got away with simply firing on people who were going about their business.
Lon Horiuchi shot Vicki Weaver.
Posted by: Thomas Kirby | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 11:41 PM
"Lon Horiuchi shot Vicki Weaver."
There's a name that should live on in infamy. A coward with a high powered sniper rifle who ambushed a woman holding an infant and shot her in the face.
Posted by: Gentle Ben | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 01:27 AM
People! NOT ONE CENT OF YOUR INCOME TAXES GOES TO THIS COUNTRY!!! NOT ONE CENT!!! All if it goes to a private company called the "Federal" reserve. Google "Zeitgeist Movie Part 3" for a full explanation of this scam. And yes the court rulings DO exist as late as 2003. The feds ignore it. Sad but true. Furthermore, the Browns pay their city, state, county and property taxes like clockwork.
Civil disobedience! Wake-up people. Our country is made great by civil disobedience. Any person who loves america should cheer them on. They are hurting noone.
Posted by: Tom C | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 03:53 AM
Uh, Thomas Kirby, did you not witness me spanking Jim Depkin back to his mommy? Title 26 of the US code is all you need, baby. And then there's that 16th Amendment.
Oh, and butler, I do dispute your 16th Amendment argument. Name one Supreme Court case that says 16 Amend doesn't apply. Just one. Can't do it, right? That's 'cause you're full of crap.
And as for Tom C, you're just certifiable. What is it about taxes that brings out the insane? Do you people not want police, fire, roads, safe food, a military, schools? Pay your taxes and STFU.
Posted by: Holden McCrank | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 07:57 AM
What I want to know is why was the guy, Danny Riley, arrested for walking the Brown's dog on their property? Wonder what happened to the dog?
Posted by: | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 10:00 AM
Gotta love "Libertarians" for the simpletons they are. I'm sympathetic to anyone who gets them self in debt by accident... but a million bucks in back taxes? How did that happen?
And as far as taxes go, how did that knucklehead build his compound in the first place? How about those roads, rail, and other transportation, energy, and communication infrastructure they seem fond of. All of which were build in part or whole from seed funds from the government, because private industry has never had the initiative to build such large scale infrastructure for the public good.
Notice that everything these people have, from the appliances to the guns to the internet, wouldn't be possible without government and taxes.
They're all from industries which depend on national infrastructure that is FED and State maintained, and use technologies that have all been subsidized at various points by the FED. Internet? The Fed built it. US industrial base was derivative of WWII and is wholly dependant of FED infrastructure from highways to rail to various subsidy and trade protections. Thier guns? Unless they're using models from the 19th century, the price they paid and the gun they got is largely derivative of military technology and market scale due to the military procurement.
I could go on, suffice to say those sorts of wingnuts just don't want to do their share.
Posted by: | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 11:28 AM
Well, if it's too convoluted for me to understand... IT MUST BE ILLEGAL/UNCONSTITUIONAL!
Please, get a brain (and a life). The 16th Amendment exists. It's not a tax on labor (i.e., a cost added to labor), but a tax on the money made ("income") via labor. It's hard to parse out, but the US Supreme Court managed it.
What law requires you to pay taxes? It's US Code Title 26, section 1(a)-(e), where each subsection states "There is HEREEBY imposed... a tax..." (after which is a table of rates) (emphasis added). I took me forever to find that, under I realized it was just past the cover page of every Title 26 volume of the United States Code or Internal Revenue Code book! There are a number of terms in those sections that are later defined, like "adjusted gross income," to determine your tax liability. If you need to know where to send it, try US Code Title 26, section 6151. The IRS has congressional authority to collect your taxes pursuant to US Code Title 26, section 6301.
Of note for protesters, US Code Title 26, section 7201 levies fines ($100k) and jail time (5 yrs) for those who "willfully" disregard their tax obligations levied pursuant to US Code Title 26, as above. A plethora of other penalities can be found in US Code Title 26, Subtitle F, Subchapter A ("Crimes"), sections 7201 to 7217.
And take your Fed scam talk back to President Andrew Jackson. I you can find his sympathetic ear at the Hermitage in Nashville, TN.
Posted by: TiredTattle | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 11:40 AM
"Do not under any circumstances make any attempt on this land. We will not accept any tomfoolery by any criminal element, be it federal, state or local,
lol. Sounds like he's got a few screws loose.
It's sad to think of him losing his freedom, but then, he could have paid his taxes, or moved to a 3rd world country and paid no taxes, and seen what it was like. but living in the USA with all the benefits, and not paying his taxes, well it's kinda dodging the bill isn't it?
Posted by: tax_paying_citizen | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 11:55 AM
Unlawfully taking your property by force?
Give me a break. It's the infrastructure of your country that allows you to MAKE an income in the first place. You use it, you have to maintain it. Do you really think that just because this guy lives out on an acreage that he isn't benefitting from state infrastructure? From the medical care that–passively–keeps him safe from infectious disease? From the police force that–passively–ensures he doesn't have to fend off bands of roving bandits? From the road networks which–passively–ensure that a network of trade is possible in which he can take part?
If you can live so completely off the grid that the IRS can't find you, then, maybe, maybe you aren't benefitting from a tax-funded infrastructure. But the IRS obviously found this guy. He's not living isolated on a secret mountaintop.
Posted by: James | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 03:06 PM
Hello Everyone,
I would like to try to clear something up. This case is not about the IRS as a whole or all of the other *many many * taxes which the American people pay.
This matter is simply in regards to the INCOME tax.
Congress tried to pass the amendment and was shot down by the supreme court (1894)which found it to be UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
The 16th amendment was not supported by 2/3 of the states and is why it is illegal.- 1913
Research it yourself.
http://www.thelawthatneverwas.com/new/home.asp
In 1916 the supreme court said that the 16th amendment did NOT empower the Federal Government to levy a new tax.
The word 'income' is not defined in the IRS code.
The word "income" was defined in a supreme court case in 1918, which states that Income is the gain or of profit derived from CORPORATE activity.
Income is not WAGES, it is not LABOR.
IRS CODE: 26 CFR CH.1 (4-1-03 Edition) States that it is "..VOLUNTARY compliance.."
Voluntary: An action undertaken of one's own free will.
"Based on research.. by the Congressional Research Service, there is NO provisions which REQUIRE an individual to pay an INCOME tax."
-Inouye, Daniel K. -US SENATE
______________________________
Let us note that this is in regards to the INCOME tax and not the other taxes which are paid to run the country.
Not one dime collected from the income tax goes into any service, the money is used to pay back INTEREST on borrowed money from the Federal Reserve.
FACT: the Federal Reserve is a PRIVATE bank.
(This is one reason it is said that Bankers run the show. However unbelievable this may seem, research it... it is all there black and white.)
________________________
The truth is that there is no law, and that is because it has been ruled as unconstitutional.
The IRS has lost cases in court many times. One such case is The Government v. Whitney Harrell. Another was Joe Banister (an ex-IRS agent who quit when after he discovered that there was no law forcing people to file an income tax).
_______________________________
Ignorance is a very dangerous leader.. Educate yourselves and stand for what is right. This matter affects us all.
Quoting a previous post
{"Come on you idiot, pay your tax bill like the rest of us and get on with your life."}
That is an opinion held by many people who simply do not want any trouble...totally understandable... but a very ignorant selfish view.
Stop thinking about yourself and start thinking about the future of your children and the nation. Stand up for the rights given to you before they are stolen.
Posted by: For the future of our children and our Nation | Monday, June 25, 2007 at 05:02 AM
Far too many Americans find it only foreign that one of their Ilk would have the courage and integrity to stand up against the Government- My appreciation belongs to the Browns!
History shows that more often it must be the individual because the masses prove to be inherently apathetic, complacent and willing to be lead rather assert themselves.
It is not only naive to believe that ones Government is always correct, it is Dangerous to assume that ones interest is always considered by the existing government.
Posted by: Franklin Viator | Wednesday, August 15, 2007 at 07:51 PM
In Iran, Putin Warns Against Military Action:
http://salihome.info/show/index.html
Posted by: sali | Thursday, October 18, 2007 at 08:48 AM
Learn what money is.
Our current Taxes are a requirement due to the monetary system.
Change the monetary system and Taxes are no longer required.
You say "WHAT?" ..
Money isn't what you think it is.
Knowledge is power.
Google the phase "Money As Debt" using the double-quotes and watch the video. Paul Grignon's animated presentation of "Money as Debt" tells in very simple and effective graphic terms what money is and how it is being CREATED. Explains the present unsustainable monetary system of the USA / World.
Note: the first 12 seconds of the video is without sound or picture.
Posted by: MoneyIsDebt | Thursday, May 08, 2008 at 08:00 AM