« San Francisco debates sanctuary policy for youths | Main | KC is No. 32 on Forbes' Safest Cities list »

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b1b869e20120a6804071970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Suspect blames steak for failing Breathalyzer:

Comments

JD lingers on your breath a wee bit longer than a cabernet reduction sauce.

There are more than a few problems with this argument, but I will try to lay out a few of the more glaring ones in case another idiot is tempted to try something like this.

1. In order to have a BAC of 0.07, an individual has to consume (on average - one and a half to two drinks (12 oz. beer, 6 oz. wine, 1 oz. spirits) within the last hour (based on weights of average adults).

2. Heat causes alcohol to evaporate out of sauces and marinated meats (which is why T.G.I. Friday's doesn't have to card you when you order one of these steaks and/or burgers).

3. No individual steak or serving of sauce is going to contain 1 1/2-2 oz. of whiskey even when uncooked, let alone the several ounces that would have to have been present to for it to have been metabolized down to a 0.07 BAC.

4. What he is trying used to be called the 'cherries jubilee' defense, after many socialites and actresses tried to use it back in the 70s to get DWI charges dismissed claiming that "oh no, officer, I haven't had anything to drink, it must have been the cherries jubilee dessert I had with my lunch'.

Automatic BS call.

There are a lot of alcohol myths but this takes the cake (I mean steak). For some others see:
http://www.lifeguardbreathtester.com/Self_Monitoring/drinking_myths.shtml

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

 
About KansasCity.com | About the Real Cities Network | Terms of Use & Privacy Statement | About the McClatchy Company | Copyright