« Shawnee cops find pot farm during routine call | Main | Say, how is Raymore's new gun policy doing? »
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Not remotely crime-related
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b1b869e20120a75cf00d970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Not remotely crime-related:


They were high school students? I think they can handle it. It's not a strip joint, and lots of restaurants have their waitresses in short skirts anyway.
I'm not saying it's right for any restaurant to have that sort of dress code, before we start on that, just that it's more than just there. ;)
Posted by: roxorz | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 09:51 AM
Could it be a training video for some in the class? LOL
And some to show them where they will meet their future mates?
ROFL
Posted by: The Golfer | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:09 AM
The servers at Hooters probably had on more clothes, and less revealing clothes, than the girls wore at the Prom this year.
Still - dumb move for a teacher.
Posted by: KC Resident | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:10 AM
Yeah, dumb for a teacher to do but Hooters isn't exactly a strip club.
Posted by: Marvin | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:15 AM
Hey, she could have just shown them hers. I wouldn't mind.
Posted by: cripjak | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:28 AM
Sometimes you just gotta have the wings no matter what.
Posted by: Cousin Eddie | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:31 AM
I see no problem! I take my two and 7 year old there all the time.
Posted by: Enrich | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:36 AM
One more example of the fact that our schools would be better off if at least half of the administrators were to be Raptured away.
Obviously good teacher who inspires students to excellence suspended by silly Puritanical administrator for trivial reason? Could be JoCo. It is almost as if there were a jealousy factor...
Actually, the only rational criticism of the restraunt choice is that the food is not all that good. The waitresses are more conservatively dressed than many of the vacationers in sunny Arizona.
Posted by: KC Cicero | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:39 AM
The prudish paranoids strike again!
The kids are sexting and hooking up and the school is concerned they might see women dressed with their arms and legs exposed. I'm no fan of Hooters, but really, this is rediculous. And trying to find a reasonably priced place for lunch for a party of 40 in downtown anyplace is a chore.
The district spokesperson said, "We believe that there are many venues for lunch for a large group of people in the downtown Phoenix area." Notice she named exactly NONE of them. That's why they call it belief and not proof.
Idiots.
Posted by: Keith G. in P.V. | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM
In a day and age where a virgin is defined as an ugly third grader, what harm is done here?
What are the odds that one of the students has a mom that works at said Hooters?
Posted by: Dr Paddy Feelgood | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 11:14 AM
Keith, certainly not their ankles, though?
Posted by: roxorz | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 12:33 PM
Hooters is a very respectable place to take kids to eat.
Posted by: seke | Friday, December 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM
I knew a girl who worked at Hooters for two years, while she was in high school.
Posted by: Ralfred | Friday, December 18, 2009 at 01:56 PM