He's everywhere, he's everywhere!
Not sure what the hook of this Wired magazine interview with Stewart and his right arm, Ben Karlin, is. Wired already established, in an earlier issue, the fact that the clip of Stewart eviscerating the two "Crossfire" hosts was probably seen by more people on the Internet than on CNN.
But hey, it's the annual TV issue and you need a hook, and who's more beloved in media circles right now than this guy? Besides, Stewart meshes perfectly with Wired's predictable take on television: The old order is dying. The new order will be dictated by technology. It will look nothing like bad old TV. It will consist entirely of the things we want to watch. Which, in Wired's view, means "The Daily Show" 24/7.
It is nice that Stewart was willing to talk on the record with Thomas Goetz about the 13 minutes that killed "Crossfire," something he wasn't willing to do earlier this year (I tried). And it was fun to see him break down the whole Wired conceit that high tech will be the next big thing in TV....
GOETZ: Yet there's a lot of venture capital going into video-delivery technologies ... Isn't there something promising about new ways to watch television?
STEWART: Sure. But how much do you need TV to be available in convenient form? It already is convenient -- we have the DVR. Do you need TV on your wach as you walk from your cell phone to your BlackBerry? At what point do we get saturated enough to say, "OK, I get it! We can watch anything we want at anytime! Let's go sit around a large table and eat a meal in silence!"
What Wired doesn't seem to get is that the ability for people to produce high-quality video at home for little money will mean they won't have to live in New York, L.A., San Fran or Vancouver, where their outlooks would be shaped, inevitably, by the cultures of those media- and creative-saturated communities. And by creative I mean "creative." Wired is looking to Yahoo or Google, but is blind to its own geographical biases. Already we are seeing high quality documentaries coming from all over, and it's not a stretch to imagine high-quality drama and comedy shows someday originating from St. Paul or Cleveland or Dallas or ... or ... Kansas City.
Then who will Conde Nast writers fall in love with?
Update: On the jump page, Goetz replies!

So if you read the sports pages even glancingly, you probably know that our Kansas City Royals are in the midst of a losing streak the likes of which Major League Baseball has rarely seen, let alone Triple-A baseball, which is where the Royals belong about now.
The only way I can bring myself to watch cable news programs (other than Keith Olbermann's admirable "Countdown") is to talk back to them, pretty much continuously. Sit with me while watching CNN or MSNBC and my side of the conversation will sound something like this: "You idiot, he just said that ... Oh, there's a great question ... If you're going to keep showing that clip, take down the LIVE graphic ... Stop talking. Now!" 