« Ad annoyeds: Mediocrity on parade | Main | Katie says bye-bye »

April 04, 2006

Comments

renton

Should Katie leave does that mean it's OK to fire Jeff Zucker?

Please?

Soonerthought

Sad. Think of all the reporters they could hire for her salary. CBS could revolutionize TV news. Talk about missed opportunities. What a sad commentary on newsd and our society. We sure have our priorities screwed up...

Louis

To me, there's one big one drawback about Couric that I haven't heard much about in this story: her voice. It's gotten very raspy and throaty, especially in the last couple of years, and these days I find her fairly unpleasant to listen to. Maybe she's just not getting enough sleep due to her morning show, but if this is a permanent condition I don't see her being extremely successful as an anchorwoman.

Mark Jeffries

Since when is increasing reporting staff "revolutionizing" news? And with the exception of "60 Minutes," when does "serious journalism" get ratings or profits? (Yeah, yeah, news should be a public trust and not a profit center, but let's be realistic about this.)

The thing that makes Couric's switch to CBS is questionable is not because of whether she can handle it (she had a solid reputation in the biz before "Today" and she can eventually overcome any stigma placed on her), but whether *anyone* could do what CBS wants her to do. The dinnertime newscast is a lumbering dinosaur made extinct by the Internet, "All Things Considered" and lifestyle changes and I'm not sure it's worth saving. If Les Moonves wanted to be really revolutionary, he would turn 8/7c (or better, 10/9c, since Fox and mini-net local news already airs in that time slot in many cities) to the news department for an hour of "The CBS Evening News" every night--but that's not going to happen, either.

The comments to this entry are closed.

TV Barn on Twitter:








Site design by A.B. with help from Julio Garcia | About KansasCity.com | Terms of Use/Privacy | Copyright | RSS | Contact