« What you missed | Main | TV Barn's TV picks for Aug. 28 »

August 28, 2006

Comments

I like The Daily Show...I do...and I'm not a Conservative, so my comments aren't political...But does the Daily Show deserve to win EVERY year? It's hard to argue that show was better than Colbert, Conan, or Letterman...

Rick

I agree. TDS has been slipping since the '04 election. The show has quit writing bits and simply turned into a collection of video clips that John Stewart can rub his eyes to. Colbert on the other hand works on a show that is entirely written. He plays a character on it, and if that isn't enough to win the writing award, then what is?

Not that I expect The Emmy's to be the epicenter of hip...

Fred Farrar

Night after night years ago, "Talk Soup" when Greg Kinnear hosted, was to me at least, far funnier than anything TDS has done since the '04 elections. In fact for several years it was the funniest show in TV -- even if you had never seen the talk shows it lampooned.

And "Talk Soup" rarely got any buzz at all.

Frankly, I think the Emmys should split itself back into broadcast and cable awards.

It is silly to even think of "The Sopranos", "Deadwood", "Rescue Me", etc., in the same category as network dramas, much less try to vote on them in the same category.

Mark Jeffries

The Emmys weren't split by cable and network. The cable industry had its own awards, first called the ACE awards and later the CableACEs. NATAS/ATAS had decided to use the 50 percent of the U.S. penetration figure that it used for syndication for cable (in the case of HBO/SHO/old-school Disney Channel the total *potential* penetration based on total cable homes) and starting in the late 80s started allowing cable to the party, making the CableACEs irrelevant by the mid-90s.

And I'm sorry, but quality is quality, no matter what channel it's on. Broadcast can't do the language/violence/sex, but they can do the multi-layered storylines, well-written scripts, strong direction, fine acting and attention to quality that the best cable shows do--if they wanted to.

Aaron

If Conan can't win with that Finland episode, the gods are against him.

It must say something that Letterman won carloads of Emmys in that 12:30 slot, while Conan has never won...To be fair, there is much more competition today than Letterman had in the 80s...(He only had to beat SNL and Carson)

Kevin Marousek

I was going to add a comment about how absurd it is that anything from the series "24" could win an Emmy, but the comment posted above in which someone wrote "He only had to beat SNL and Carson" ranks as even more absurd. As if the hay-day of Saturday Night and even the worst day of Carson's Tonight Show weren't scores better than the gobs of garbage currently passing for late night/variety entertainment. I can assume that comment was written by a young'un or... I don't know... maybe a drunk with no sense of history or proportion.

SIGH

If you can name the other 2 competitors in that category in the 1980s that was of high quality...Feel Free....

As for the early 1980s version of Saturday Night Live being "of high quality" I can only assume you are joking, or a complete idiot...Carson was fading by 1980....

I'm really impressed by your post though, Kevin....It takes a lot of thinking to try and make a small point, and then call anyone who doesn't agree with you a drunk....Good to see you put that 7th Grade education to work!

The comments to this entry are closed.

TV Barn on Twitter:








Site design by A.B. with help from Julio Garcia | About KansasCity.com | Terms of Use/Privacy | Copyright | RSS | Contact