« TV Barn's TV Picks for September 20 | Main | Jay wants you (maybe) »

September 20, 2006

Comments

Rhonda Johnston

I really enjoyed Jericho last night except for a few minor problems. Number one: What's up with Hollywood's idea of what Kansas looks like? As a lifelong resident I was jarred by the landscape in the first half of the show. It was lovely, but it certainly wasn't Kansas or even "Kansas-like". Oh, well, I know most of the nation doesn't care, and I doubt that the scenery will play a large role in the show as it develops. Number two was Gerald McRaney (as you mentioned). Has he forgotten how to act or are his lines that bad? He certainly brought the show to a halt every scene he was in. Again, I'll have to hope he either gets better or we see less of him as the show progresses.

Regardless, it was a very exciting and interesting show. I'm really looking forward to the rest of the season.

Aaron

McRaney's lines were that bad. And he's not that good (it says a lot about HBO, David Milch and his crew that his "Deadwood" character was kinda compelling). Fortunately, he's all but absent from episode two. I wonder if that was a CBS casting call. A really poor choice. And it was Gov. Sebelius herself, god bless er, who noted last week that there is no place you can stand in the state of Kansas and see mountains.

Rhonda Johnston

Skeet Ulrich's drive from Denver to Jericho was particularly interesting considering it looked nothing like Kansas (or Eastern Colorado). We did a double-take when the scene showing the "Welcome to Kansas" sign had a lovely city in the background complete with skyscrapers. Looked like you could see KC from the Kansas/Colorado border. That's a trick.

Marti

I agree. The landscape ws all wrong, whereas McRaney's speech (actually his whole performance) was as flat as Kansas actually is. The "mysterious past" was a bit of a draw and I did find it interesting that the black man seemed to keep his head about him better than any of the feuding white folks. I'll give it another shot.

Mo Ryan

Regarding the landscape, it could have been worse (maybe). Skeet Ulrich swung through Chicago on a promotional thingie, and said that when the show was pitched to him, the producers wanted to film it in Calgary. He said no way, so I think they're filming it in some remote part of the Valley in LA.

Here in Chicago, btw, we had a good laugh when the O'Hare Airport on "The Loop" had mountains in the background.

TTC

Oh geez, don't tell me you're all so jaded as to need an factually errorless TV SHOW in order to be entertained.

It's called willing suspension of disbelief and it is the key element in being entertained. These shows cannot possibly sustain a perfect facade without eventually collapsing under the weight of having everything perfect and no show would last past the first episode.

It almost seems like the nitpickers feel that they deserve perfection in order to keep thier interest instead of being satisfied with what they are given.

Finally, if the small errors bother you that much, don't watch it.

Garry

Sorry, but to suspend my disbelief, I have to actually care about the story.
I really doubt that any of these serial shows will survive.
"Kidnapped" had a shootout on a Manhattan street, but there isn't any news coverage of it.
Come on, get real!

me

Jericho is way too depressing. Who wants to sit down every week and contemplate a nuclear disaster? Not me! The show will not last.

Dean

I agree with Mo Ryan completely.

Grace

I LOVE JERICHO and ADORE GERALD MCRANEY!!
Wait until you see the episodes in March. I think you will change your mind about Gerald McRaney not being good or having a good part in this show.
Let me know ok?

The comments to this entry are closed.

TV Barn on Twitter:








Site design by A.B. with help from Julio Garcia | About KansasCity.com | Terms of Use/Privacy | Copyright | RSS | Contact