« September 2007 | Main | November 2007 »

38 entries from October 2007

October 31, 2007

October 30, 2007

October 29, 2007

October 26, 2007

October 25, 2007

October 24, 2007


The verbal interchange lasted some three minutes, after which Fox called the interview to an end, and before getting up from his seat, he extended his hand to Luengas, saying, “Friends as always.”

What follows is an excerpt of the interview. (The video can be viewed in the Videos section of the website www.telemundo52.com .):
 
Ruben Luengas (RL): I say with the best of intentions, I read those books and I say…
   
Vicente Fox (VF): Hardly (with the best of intentions)!  Show them, show them, give them to me, give them to me (demanding that RL show him copies of those he had referred to) … No, no, no. Leave it, leave it (speaking to the people who had come with him) this will be short and after they will go on criticizing me that I didn’t give them a chance.  Two minutes more…

RL: …The documents of the registry of public property of Guanajuato say: the owners of the properties that you say are not yours, indeed are, according to this document –
 
VF: Which property?
   
RL: -- and Marta Sahagun…
   
VF: Speak clearly, which property?   
RL: La Estancia.   
VF: Marta Sahagun doesn’t have property in San Cristobal…   
RL: But that’s what the documents say, or are they false, the documents that have been published?   
VF: Ask the question properly, please.   
RL: The public registry of property in Guanajuato says, I don’t know if the document is false or not, because then I invite a lawsuit from this person…   
VF: During this time (referring to the time period referenced in the document) it wasn’t hers.  Marta Sahagun has a hectare (in La Estancia), my brother Jose has 10 hectares in La Estancia and there are other owners in La Estancia.  I challenge you not to tell lies…   
RL: That’s why I ask about it…   
VF: I challenge you to ascertain things in a direct manner…   
RL: But the document from the public registry of property says yes, it is yours…   
VF: Clearly, I have a lot of properties.  RL: You denied it, you said it wasn’t yours.  You said that those ranches weren’t yours.   
VF: Don’t you have any properties?
RL: Yes, I do have some.   
VF: How good, how good that you are doing well. I will return to see how you say to all Mexicans what I have there, and if not, I will have to call you a liar and a slanderer.   
RL: I am not accusing you…   
VF: You are, you are accusing me in front …   
RL: Excuse me, I am not accusing you.  VF: That’s the classic…   
RL: I am asking you to answer me. You want an easy little interview. [literally, “smooth little”]
VF: You are a bad interviewer. Excuse me, and hopefully you will throw out your interview. 

RL: Clearly. 

VF: You are lying. 

RL: I am asking about people who have accused you – 

VF: You said that Marta was the owner but she’s not… 

RL: That’s what the titles to the property say. 

Off-camera voice (in English): We have to go. 

RL: I am not saying it, I’m saying that you should respond because it says it there. 

VF: You’re lying… 

RL: Who, me? I’ll say it to your face: you are accusing me of something false.  I am not accusing you. You are accusing me.
   Before Fox gets up from his seat, he extends his hand to the journalist and says: “Friends like always, old pal [literally, “little old man” but not normally that pejorative], and don’t use the time of your people, your clients, in this way, to mislead.”
  RL: And you shouldn’t use the country to avoid responding to the questions that I am asking.
VF: Good day.
  RL: Thank you.
   VF: Thank you. (While Fox’s microphone is being disconnected, he argues with the reporter who, from his seat, counters by insisting that he is just asking questions about what the documents say.) You are a vulgar person.
   RL: That’s good sir, have a good day.
   VF: Goodbye. (Fox leaves the set. A person from the staff thanks him for his presence and he answers also with a thank you.) “I don’t know why they brought me to this,” he says before leaving.

 A big thank you to Michael Staudenmaier for offering to translate this. --AB

| | Comments (0)

|

Vicente Fox on "The Daily Show": Something lost in translation

First, let's get over the fantasy that "The Daily Show" is not a news program. The nation's TV critics gave it a TCA award for news in 2004, and our decision was controversial then (Andy Heyward, then the head of CBS news, stormed out of the ceremony declaring, "You'll never see us pawning off fake news on the American public!" -- OK, I made up that quote, but he was PO'd at the TCA). But no one would care now. Not with Pew polls finding that more young Americans consider Jon Stewart their Charlie Gibson. Not when Frank Rich borrows Op-Ed ideas from Stewart and Stephen Colbert.

Continue reading "Vicente Fox on "The Daily Show": Something lost in translation" »

October 23, 2007

Second impressions of the new shows

Nbc_chuck1

(Above: The gorgeous women keep throwing themselves at Chuck. And he keeps saying no! Click the pic for a two-minute recap of last week's ep.)

This was one of those fall premiere seasons when no new network show leaped off the screen. No “Lost.” No “24.” Not even a “Secret Diary of Desmond Pfeiffer.” It happens. And when it happens, I've learned to hedge my bets.

  Since mid-July I've been telling you that while some TV pilots impressed me, I wanted to see the second episodes of these new fall shows before passing final judgment. I've now had that opportunity. The viewers have also had a chance to weigh in.

Continue reading "Second impressions of the new shows" »

October 22, 2007

Audience relations: Bill Maher v. Rush Limbaugh

Reading yesterday's New York Times story on Jerry Seinfeld made me aware of how much practice it takes to be a comedian, to be likable and at the same time be true to yourself — which in the case of a lot of comedians means being self-centered and angry a lot of the time.

Seinfeld and Larry David are masters at this balancing act, but I can't recall anyone who's had to pull it off on live TV at a moment's notice. That's just what happened to Bill Maher during the Friday night telecast of his HBO talk show when certain audience members rose up to sabotage his show.

Before we look at that video, however, let's enjoy a classic moment from 1990. It's late at night in the very same building "Real Time" is now taped — CBS Television City — and Rush Limbaugh is hosting "The Midnight Hour," the show that was "The Pat Sajak Show" until Pat started getting lower ratings than Arsenio Hall. As you'll see, members of the audience begin to act up (indeed, the stunt was organized by ACT UP), and unless your name is Rush Limbaugh, the rest is nothing short of great television. (If it doesn't load, try this.):

Continue reading "Audience relations: Bill Maher v. Rush Limbaugh" »

"Damages" and "Phenomenon"

On WBAL today, Shari Elliker and I talked about the ratings challenges facing FX's latest challenging new drama. And we yakked about NBC's latest nutty reality scheme, "Phenomenon," aka "Last Mentalist Standing."

Rise and shine, Kris Ketz

(Above: KMBC-9's very first "FirstNews," from 1988, wasn't much of a high-stakes affair. KMBC-9 will be joining other Hearst-Argyle stations with its own YouTube space. Official launch, I'm told, is Wednesday.)

Last night, if all went according to plan, Kris Ketz and his 2-year-old went to bed at the same time. That way, one of them could wake up at 2:30 a.m. for his first day as KMBC-9 morning news anchor.

Continue reading "Rise and shine, Kris Ketz" »

October 21, 2007

Email of the week

Frobisher_2

We waited until the 11th hour to declare a winner of this week's competition, but our patience was rewarded as two wonderfully weird letters arrived this afternoon.

Continue reading "Email of the week" »

October 20, 2007

The "Jack" ad you never saw

Well, at least I never saw it before. While en route to looking up other things (as Sydney J. Harris used to say), I found this rare 60-second "Cops" spoof commercial for burger chain Jack in the Box.  Those stores aren't in our area (heck, we just got our first Chick-Fil-A's), which probably explains why I didn't see it.  Only the 30's are run on network TV. It's a hoot.

October 19, 2007

"Damages": When good shows get bad ratings

(Above: A 10-minute catcher-upper on the season of "Damages." For a slightly less frenetic version, a 12-hour marathon begins at 7 a.m. CT Saturday on FX.)

Two years ago, FX took a huge gamble by staging a war drama set in present-day Iraq. “Over There” depicted combat at its most depersonalized and nihilistic, with storylines ripped from the real Mess O' Potamia. Steven Bochco, the “NYPD Blue” producer, wanted to put a war most Americans seemed eager to forget back into their living rooms as fictional fact.

Continue reading ""Damages": When good shows get bad ratings" »

October 18, 2007

"Mad Men" or "Viva Laughlin": The non-tough call of the day

When it comes to adapting British TV shows for American tastes, there seems to be no middle ground. Either the de-Anglified version is brilliant (“Sanford & Son,” “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire,” “The Office”) or it stinks (“The Weakest Link,” “Coupling”).

  I'm not quite ready to drag “Viva Laughlin,” CBS's attempt to replicate the Brit hit “Blackpool,” into the “stinks” category. But that's only because I'm extending it the same courtesy as every other new show this fall: I'm withholding judgment until I can see a second episode -- in this case, out of the perhaps naïve belief that America's top-rated network did not just suck the life out of a quirky, Peabody Award-winning sensation.

  But if you have to choose tonight, do not stop on CBS. Instead, go directly to AMC and watch the season finale of “Mad Men,” also at 9 p.m. CT.  Not only is it a far better TV series, tonight's episode is commercial free.

Continue reading ""Mad Men" or "Viva Laughlin": The non-tough call of the day" »

Next »