« Not "Save Jericho" again! | Main | WTF-TV: "The Two Coreys" »

June 30, 2008

Comments

CableTechTalk

I hear your pain. Issues arising from the switched digital video transition have been cropping up for a few months (for example, see here). I'm not understanding part of your complaint. Yes, it wasn't anticipated that the two-way issue would create this particular set of problems, but there is a solution on the way. See this coverage for more information on how we got here.

But your post also complains that TWC didn't have "enough replacement CableCards," but you don't say why you think that. The CableCARDs have nothing to do with this. Just this morning, I posted some background on CableCARDs that addresses some of this confusion.

Finally, you're clearly upset about what is getting transitioned to SDV delivery. Everybody would like their favorite networks on analog basic. But some things are put on digital tiers and some things will be the first to move to SDV. There's not infinite bandwidth and something's got to be chosen for the move. Sorry if it's your favorites. I'd be bummed if it happened to me.

Aaron

Paul, this isn't a matter of wanting to watch a channel on "analog cable." This is about wanting TO WATCH A CHANNEL I AM PAYING FOR. I mean, if I'm going to be gone from my house for three weeks I cancel the paper. If Time Warner is not going to give me "Torchwood" or "Greensburg" or Sundance's "The Green" for several months until they can figure out how to get me a damn CableCARD capable of receiving it, why should I pay for digital cable until they do?

MGZ

I'm from NJ and my local cable provider has just begun to deploy SDV. Be forewarned, you will notice slow channel changing and sporatic pixeling as SDV tries to manage the bandwith. If you are on an overused node (over 2000 users) their fiber optic network is not going to help you. They will also make attempts to move many or all analog channels to digital in order to increase the bandwith. Boxless subscribers will lose the channels or will be forced to rent a digital box and/or get a digital adapter (usually offered by the cable provider) in order to get the moved channels. Further, the digital cable card is being slowly killed via political moves in Washington by the cable industry trade groups.

Bottom line, your pockets will be fleeced.

Scott Simerly

Isn't it amazing how TWC can devote so much time to coming up with new technologies when it still hasn't fixed problems with its current program guide and DVR software? Of course, creating new technology would save TWC money while also providing an incentive for customers to switch from a Tivo (where TWC receives no payment) to a TWC DVR.

With tough economic times ahead, TWC may soon find that its poor customer relations and pricing plans have deemed it a luxury item not worth the trouble. After all, most programming can be found online or through Netflix.

BTW, I couldn't agree more that the channel switch for BBC America was appalling. Interesting how TWC fears switching out other channels like Nickelodeon, Disney and MTV.

As for Paul at CableTechTalk what would you expect from a paid shill for the cable industry.

CableTechTalk

MGZ: I'm curious when you state this: "the digital cable card is being slowly killed via political moves in Washington by the cable industry trade groups."

I work in D.C. at NCTA, which is the principal trade association for the U.S. cable industry. What political moves are you referring to?

Engadget HD has a post today explaining what switched digital video is, although they make the mistake of referring to CableCARDs as being one-way or two-way.

Big Wizz

@CableTechTalk,

Ummm, CableCard 1.0 IS one-way communication.

CableCard 2.0 (now know as tru2way) is two-way communication. (which, btw, needs NEW hardware to work. So, all those TVs, TiVo's, etc people have bought for their cablecards won't work with tru2way cards)

So how, exactly, was EngadgetHD mistaken?

And please don't insult us, by insinuating the cable industry doesn't have lobbyists in D.C. Every major industry does and they all have their underlying motives.

MGZ

Scott Simerly:

In regards to "political moves", you don't have to be a rocket scientist to see the forest for the trees. Since the CableCard was announced the cable industry has shown little or no support for the technology. It does not generate any decent revenue for them and only causes them support issues. The cable techs in my area I have spoken to (one is a personal friend of mine) tell me the same thing. They try to convince customers not to get the cable card as per undocumented instructions from the cable company. I'm quite sure the same is happening in Washington but in a suttle way. The FCC rammed the cable card down the throats of the cable companines. By making the experience unrewarding to the customer, the cable industry is hoping to be rid of this technology so they can push their more expensive services.

TexasLabRat

@ Big Wizz:

Almost correct. The cable cards remain the same (there's no special "tru2way" cable card..there are only singe-stream cards and multi-stream cards just as there have been up to this point). What is different is the presence of a transceiver that can talk upstream to the head-end *in the device itself* (or attached to it in some way eg via USB). Such a transceiver is physically separate from the cable cards...which remain dedicated to authentication/authorization and decrypting streams. Any "legacy" cable-card enabled device with a USB port *and* the ability to take an upgraded firmware image can utilize the "tuning resolvers" that will be released in late summer/early fall by the cable companies. Of course, the number of devices that qualify for that is rather small...Series-3 Tivos' (including the little-brother "HD" variant) seem to be the main beneficiaries. Point being, it's not quite as gloom-and-doom as you've made it out to be, due to the factual errors in your argument. For those who have cable-card enabled televisions without USB ports, yeah..it sucks for them. But the other main example..cable-card tivos...they will be just fine once the tuning resolvers are available to plug into them.

jeff

Well, "later this year" is what TWC said. I have a Tivo, and as far as I can get out of TWC, they still don't have the adapter and they still won't tell me when. Heard anything?????

Jim

I cancelled time warner cable over this cablecard scam. I had purchased a top shelf tivo with the promise that I could get my digital hd service through the company's cable cards. Only when the tech's actually arrived was I told about the fact I could not get most of my premium packages since the cable cards need two way communication to access these under the SDV limitations. No one, up to the level of the corporate offices, warned me about these problems, even when questioned well in advance. Fortunately tivo was willing to refund my thousand some bucks, but it still was a C ote worth of shipping and aggravation. Goodbye and good riddance Time Warner.

The comments to this entry are closed.

TV Barn on Twitter:








Site design by A.B. with help from Julio Garcia | About KansasCity.com | Terms of Use/Privacy | Copyright | RSS | Contact