« MSNBC's Imus-ectomy is complete: Gwen Ifill makes an appearance | Main | In local news, local sports dominates local Emmy nominations »

August 25, 2008

Comments

Ken Okel

I'm curious whether there is legitimate concern that the digital switch could see viewers unprepared, leading them permanently to other sources for video content. It's something new to have a industry change while still staying the same.

Gwennie

I just recently got a HD TV and actually KMBC is the channel I get the best. However KCTV is constantly pixelating on me though the analog version of KCTV comes in fine. (I use an omnidirectional antenna in my attic.) I called the engineer at KCTV. He was puzzled and had no advice for me. I guess I'll just have to put up with it.

Dan

It would appear that MyKsmo has already begun flickering their signal, but unfortunately what went dead is it's Dtv 62 frequency, which can now be found at 47, minus the EPG information. Perhaps they need to get their digital channels up and running reliably before they run such a test? There appears to be a common problem that digital broadcasters have been discovering along the way to full digital conversion. Some of the new equipment that is an important part of the data stream is less than reliable.
I love the quality of the broadcast when eveything is working and wish them well.

The comments to this entry are closed.

TV Barn on Twitter:








Site design by A.B. with help from Julio Garcia | About KansasCity.com | Terms of Use/Privacy | Copyright | RSS | Contact