« TV Barn Ticker for today ... | Main | Regional Murrow Awards: KCTV-5 live, late-breaking, lauded »

April 09, 2009

Comments

Patrick Brown

To take it all the way back to the beginning, David Simon wrote about the fake lie detector trick actually being used by real cops in his book "Homicide", which of course begat the TV show by the same name and eventually "The Wire". Of course I know you were a big "Homicide" fan, since I've been reading your blog since that show was on the air!

[Thanks, Patrick, for the book's URL, which opened Pandora's box!--AB]

Ryan

Thanks for your blog about this, I noticed it too.

As for why "The Unusuals" shouldn't have done the scene -- it's repetitive for people who have seen it before.

I wanted something new for a series debut. Should I invest time in a show that is going to that well in its pilot?

The scene was the only scene I saw from last night's premiere and it turned me off. It was the fourth time I had seen or read about the polygraph-by-photocopier. My mind went back to the characters from "Homicide" and "The Wire," and I wasn't ready to embrace these new "unusual" characters.

I may tune in again to see how the show develops, but there is a lot of other TV shows for me to catch up on.

Thomas Allen Heald, Esquire

I liked the "Skittles reduction. Sorry, I ran outta fruit," but not a lot else with the pilot ...

JimBo

The Unusuals seemed anything but. Like Southland -- both use characters and circumstances seen dozens of times before on TV cop shows. Neither seem interesting enough, new enough or -- and especially -- unusual enough to deserve viewing a second episode.
But the real question is -- as is so often the case -- how did these shows even make it onto the TV schedule? Not by virtue of their boring pilot episodes.
Sure Southland has John Wells' name attached, which appears to be the only reason it got on. But The Unusuals? Wow... that's the only real mystery about this show.

Peter Brown

Whether the copier trick is myth or history, anyone writing a cop show in 2009 has to know that the gimmick was used in the two Simon shows H:LOTS and The Wire. To use it again is not an homage but cheesy. If they didn't know, then they're not educated enough about their medium or genre to be allowed to write a cop show in 2009.

The comments to this entry are closed.

TV Barn on Twitter:








Site design by A.B. with help from Julio Garcia | About KansasCity.com | Terms of Use/Privacy | Copyright | RSS | Contact