« The fiscal challenges that confront U.S. | Main | Consider flat tax »

April 30, 2006

Arizona stadium

Thanks to Steve Penn on his column on the new stadium in Arizona (4/25, Metro, "Arizona has lessons for KC"). Great column. One month too late.

Given that $65 million of the Arizona stadium cost went toward infrastructure improvements (which would have been unnecessary if building a new stadium at the Truman Sports Complex), for a mere $25 million more than our Question 1 tax plan Kansas City could have had a brand new football stadium, with all of the luxury suites, concourses, Jumbotrons and even a retractable roof (and our Super Bowl). However, thanks to The Star's and county government's persuasion, Jackson County passed a tax for the same amount that doesn't include a roof and Super Bowl, but only renovations to a 35-year-old stadium.

It's becoming more and more obvious every day that Jackson Countians got conned by our local government and a bad plan.

Our best hope now is to hope for the best in how the Chiefs spend our tax dollars - a risk we shouldn't have to take.

Brent Toellner
Kansas City

Comments

BrentT

Jack,

I couldn't agree more for baseball -- or honestly for football either as far as personal experience goes. But the fact of the matter is that the powers that be in this city were promised a Super Bowl if, and only if, the football stadium had a roof on it (have to have a controlled environment for the game). The taxpayers in Jackson County are paying $325 million in renovations to Arrowhead -- that money does not include a roof (an extra $200 million according to their projections). For $350 million (plus some infastructure improvements that would have been unnecessary in KC) Arizona is getting a brand new stadium, with a retractable roof, and a Super Bowl in 2009. For $25 million less than that, we are only getting renovations. For $200 million more than that, we can get exactly the same thing they're getting.

For some reason our county leaders are horrilbe at economics and it's very concerning.

jack

The Minnesota Twins have a proposal on the table to build a new stadium. At their request, there are no plans for a roof. According to the Twins, outdoor baseball, even in Minnesota, is preferable.

And we need a dome here why?

 
About KansasCity.com | About the Real Cities Network | Terms of Use & Privacy Statement | About Knight Ridder | Copyright