« Guantanamo Bay series | Main | Old enough for war but not P&L »

June 26, 2008

Tragedy victims aren’t heroes

I lost a friend in the 1981 collapse of the Hyatt Regency’s skywalk. This unnecessary catastrophe is personal to me, and my personal sense of loss remains. But a bronze memorial is not an appropriate response.

The purpose of a public memorial needs definition — maybe to raise standards and to inspire us to reach higher in our own achievements. I’ve learned that the people of a nation tend to memorialize their failures when successes to be proud of become fewer — thus the Oklahoma City bombing site garden and the 9/11 Ground Zero memorial.

There is nothing heroic about being in a place where you are unexpectedly killed. Had someone spotted the dangerous truck parked at the Oklahoma federal building and driven it off, I would have donated a statue to him. The memorial-worthy at 9/11 were not those killed in the exploding airplanes and collapsing buildings, but those who endangered themselves to salvage those who could be saved.

Every fatal car wreck, every drowning leaves behind people like Kevin Cooper (6/22, Letters) and me, people who need to suffer their losses privately.

Ronald W. McReynolds
Warrensburg, Mo.

Comments

T. Hanson

I agree with this letter. Too many times we just put up a monument for the victims.

Maybe the money would be better use for a donation towards the families, or research to advert the disaster.

solomon

I have to agree with this letter. A plaque in the hotel would seem to be appropriate, not a memorial like to our firefighters by the old River Road.

I had an employee who perished in the Coates hotel fire. I think of him when I drive by there. Some things are allways in our memory.

 
About KansasCity.com | About the Real Cities Network | Terms of Use & Privacy Statement | About Knight Ridder | Copyright