« By the books … | Main | Universal care would cut costs »

March 29, 2009

Kansas City University?

Great cities have great universities. Denver has Denver University, Chicago has the University of Chicago, and Memphis has, well, Memphis. Kansas City, on the other hand, has UMKC, four letters that mean something to you and me but essentially nothing to anyone living outside the Kansas City region.

UMKC is making tremendous strides, investing millions in new construction, adding more student housing and continuing to have several programs at or near the top of their respective fields nationally. It is a superb institution, churning out some of the brightest and most talented students in the Midwest. Yet, my presumption is that many of these accolades get discounted primarily because of the school’s lack of an identity.

I am most certainly not proposing that UMKC should leave the University of Missouri system. Rather just a simple name change, similar to what Missouri-Rolla recently did. Kansas City University ... has a nice ring huh? The name pays homage to the university’s roots and would serve as a face and identity for a great school.

Nicholas Grunauer
UMKC alum
Kansas City



DU? Oh please, give me a break. UMKC is every bit as competitive as DU and Memphis. Mr. Grunauer needs to refine his analogies. Chicago is a good example though, maybe add NYU (Stern School consistently in the top 20) or Berkeley to the list, but DU? I don't think so....


This guy reminds me of some of the boys in 7th grade gym class showers, participating but feeling envious. I have a brother who graduated from the UMKC med school and does not suffer from any stigma.

Stifled Freedom

Nice ring, but it wont happen.

About KansasCity.com | About the Real Cities Network | Terms of Use & Privacy Statement | About Knight Ridder | Copyright