Sarah Palin is convinced that John McCain’s presidential campaign staff, once they realized that he was going down in defeat, acted to ensure that she lost as well.
Otherwise, she is certain, she could have easily beaten Joe Biden and been a great help to President Obama.
Michael Mardikes
Kansas City

“Personally, I can't wait for the independent "true conservative" ticket of Palin/Dobbs.” - jack
Considering the results we’re getting with the current true liberal ticket, you make it sound like a bad thing.
“Now there is a pair to draw too!” - jack
Yes, both tickets lead by cult personalities...... sigh
Posted by: GCYL | November 24, 2009 at 08:46 PM
Anyone actually CARES what Martha Stewart thinks?
Personally, I can't wait for the independent "true conservative" ticket of Palin/Dobbs.
Now there is a pair to draw too!
Posted by: jack | November 24, 2009 at 06:30 PM
In a CNN interview, convicted felon Martha Stewart called Gov. Sarah Palin "boring," "very dangerous," and "a real problem" among other things. Probably, only the desperately frightened leftist news media listed to Stewart. You betcha.
Posted by: parkay | November 24, 2009 at 05:37 PM
Or should I say that I hope the conservative Madonna runs for president since our conservative friends like to bring religious connotations to referrals about Democratic candidates.
Posted by: Wild Man | November 24, 2009 at 03:15 PM
I actually hope that Palin runs for president and gets the nomination. At some point in time she will have to answer questions stronger than the rehearsed softball questions of O'Rielly and the rest of FOX News.
Posted by: Wild Man | November 24, 2009 at 02:40 PM
Of course we all know Obama is a real truth teller now don't we. Palin did say it, I never said she didn't. She was following the campaign instead of saying what she really thought. Of course, why would you care Jim, you are a believer in writing hot checks and spending OPM for deadbeat welfare.
Posted by: NoMoreMrNiceGuy | November 24, 2009 at 11:00 AM
You must have flunked basic reading comprehension. Palin was all over the TV during the debate on the bailout supporting it and saying it was the right thing to do.
It's not suprising that she's trying to rewrite history. She lies about things constantly and contradicts herself even more often than that. The facts are manifestly against you (as usual). Nice try, though.
Posted by: Jim | November 24, 2009 at 10:40 AM
So Jim you continue to deny that Barney Frank said "woll the dicesttttth"?
Rather blame Bush when Bush had nothing to do with the mortgage fall out.
How do you know what someone believes in?
I guarantee you Palin does not support the welfare bailouts, she was told to follow McCain's lead. You must have fluinked basic accounting principals.
Posted by: NoMoreMrNiceGuy | November 24, 2009 at 09:32 AM
I think my last post made my opinion obvious.
Posted by: hajkar
I didn't think you would post it!
Posted by: Greghand | November 24, 2009 at 08:52 AM
Last week we saw a reporter remind a Palin worshiper who criticized the bailout that The One supported the bailout (there's even a supportive passage about it in her new book). Smoke started pouring from her ears and the words DOES NOT COMPUTE practically flew out of her mouth. I was actually kind of embarrassed for her.
Now we have more insight into the typical Palin worshiper. They have no clue what she actually believes. It's fitting, because neither does Palin.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKKKgua7wQk
Posted by: Jim | November 24, 2009 at 08:22 AM
Sorry, meant "side of the road".
Posted by: jeanette | November 24, 2009 at 01:08 AM
This whole mess started with Bush, now continuing with Obama, politicians go to Washington and within a few years happen to become millionaires, Lousiana getting $300 million for a "yes" vote, a president who seems more interested in socializing and giving campaign speeches instead of governing, our soldiers caught in the middle. You get the idea.
And we're supposed to have respect for these people and want any of them leading us? Please.
I've seen a sign by the sign of the road that says "Don't Make Me Come Down There. Signed, God" I'm beginning to think maybe it's time.
Posted by: jeanette | November 24, 2009 at 01:06 AM
Palin's standard talking points make the Obama campaign "promises" look specific to the finest detail.
"My idiot's better than your idiot!
My idiot's better than your's!
My idiot's better because the radio told me so!
My idiot's better than your's"
My apologies to Kennel Ration.
Posted by: jack | November 24, 2009 at 12:39 AM
I think my last post made my opinion obvious.
Posted by: hajkar | November 23, 2009 at 08:28 PM
Jeanette is right! I don't prefer one over the other! Neither belong in politics. What's the Hijackers opinion on Obama's media status?
Posted by: Greghand | November 23, 2009 at 08:23 PM
You prefer one whore over another?
Posted by: hajkar | November 23, 2009 at 07:50 PM
As opposed to who, hijkar? Obama, who has never met a camera or photo op he hasn't liked?
I've never seen a politician yet who would turn their backs on a camera.
Posted by: jeanette | November 23, 2009 at 07:20 PM
Palin is a media whore.
Posted by: hajkar | November 23, 2009 at 02:51 PM
If Palin was a lesbian and ran on the platform of being a victim of the "greedy corporations" she would have been popular with liberals. It was too bad she was coached and told what to say. She simply followed behind the Presidential candidate.
I would imagine she knows spending money that does not exist is not prudent.
Posted by: NoMoreMrNiceGuy | November 23, 2009 at 11:18 AM
A lot of liberals were energized because of Palin. I know since McCain was pretty liberal in his platform he was doing pretty good bringing in the moderate liberals till they brought in Palin. Then justified or not Palin was painted as a radical right and that shoved off the moderate libs.
Posted by: T. Hanson | November 23, 2009 at 10:25 AM