Is it a candidate’s actions of 20, 30, 40 years ago, or what he will do now, tomorrow and tomorrow’s tomorrow?
Is it his ability to raise a company, raze a company and then recoup his gains for making a part more important than the whole?
Is it a candidate’s ability to be cautious, able to see the results of actions yet to be done?
What better arena for candidates to prove themselves than that of a democracy of the people, by the people, for the people and not their own egos?
William Pitchford
Kansas City
"Is it a candidate's ability to be cautious, able to see the results of actions yet to be done?"-William
....vote Kreskin 2012....
Posted by: solomon | March 30, 2012 at 07:22 AM