C.W. Gusewelle’s article (5/18, Local, “A storm, then a crime against humanity”) comments that the reason tragedies such as those in Myanmar and Sudan are unfolding is because the U.S. military is stretched so thin and is unable to respond.
Is not the reason our military is stretched thin because we went into another country with a military force to topple a dictator who was committing atrocities against a great part of his country? Where people were not treated equally, especially women, and thousands were executed. Oh yes, it was Iraq. And yet he continues to criticize the administration that effected this action and the war itself.
Quite frankly, Mr. Gusewelle, I find your comments, as I do most of the left-leaning liberals in this great country, quite hypocritical. I think it might be best if you stick to writing about your cabin in the Ozarks. I enjoy those.
Or write a letter to your friends in France and ask them where they are. They should have plenty of troops to send, because they sure aren’t in Iraq.
David Whitaker
Overland Park
I agree that the tragedy caused by the cyclone in Myanmar has been compounded by the military junta’s complete indifference to the suffering of its own citizens and outright theft, but C.W. Gusewelle loses me about two-thirds of the way through his article.
Gusewelle writes that the U.S. should have organized an international force to deliver aid to the victims of Myanmar “by whatever coercive means necessary,” presumably to include going to war against Myanmar’s military dictatorship to effect regime change so the victims of the cyclone could receive aid. Then Gusewelle goes on to blame our military commitment in Iraq as the reason we are unable to use our military in places such as Myanmar and Sudan.
I guess some wars are more politically correct, and some citizens are more entitled to democratic governments, than others. Are the only military actions Gusewelle and others like him will support are ones that pass some sort of liberal litmus test?
Stephen M. Smith
Kansas City, Kan.
So, let me get this straight: The Burmese people are ruled by thugs who will not let in aid and should be prosecuted, and terrorists continue to operate in Pakistan and Afghanistan, all because the U.S. has chosen to fight terrorists in Iraq? And the U.S .should “deliver aid by whatever coercive means necessary”?
Mr. Gusewelle, you cannot deliver aid coercively. That is an oxymoron. Stick to stories about dogs and cats. You do those well.
Gwen Royle
Parkville